GNU bug report logs

#47297 Release 1.3.0 checklist

Package	Source(s)		Maintainer(s)
guix		PTS Buildd Popcon

Reported by Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Date 2021-03-21T17:39:01
Severity important
Done Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Fix blocked by No subject, icedtea-3 binaries contain references to icedtea-2, Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", guix-install.sh does not add build users to kvm group, [PATCH] gnu: Remove QT 4., [PATCH] gnu: tzdata: Update to 2021a., got unexpected path `Backtrace:' from substituter, Let's Encrypt certificate store (le-certs) expired, Service manager "init scripts" missing from current-guix, libupnp package vulnerable to CVE-2021-28302, Zabbix packages vulnerable to CVE-2021-27927, pjproject package is vulnerable to CVE-2021-21375 and CVE-2020-15260, [PATCH 0/1] Remove Clang 3.6.2., QEMU warning about performance, Test failure in tests/publish.scm with commit 1955ef93b76e51cab5bed4c90f7eb9df7035355a, [PATCH] gnu: guix: Fix openrc init scripts., ‘qt-build-system’ retains too many references via wrappers, Icecat doesnt show numbers for anything, Guix install script on foreign distro fails to add berlin public key, ldap test is failing, Segmentation fault when calling 'git-predicate' in a package file, guile-git-0.5.0.drv build failed on i686-linux, [1.2.1 pre-release testing] substitute downloading and TLS errors, [installer image] grub-install efi fails getting canonical path to /boot/efi on dos-formatted disk, (guix import go) introduces hard dependency on Guile-Lib, [PATCH] maint: Do not xz-compress ISO images., [1.3.0rc2] ‘guix describe’ prints nothing and exits with 0.
Bug is Archived

Reply or subscribe to this bug. View this bug as an mbox, status mbox, or maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#47297; Package guix. (Sun, 21 Mar 2021 17:39:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Acknowledgement sent to Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@gnu.org. (Sun, 21 Mar 2021 17:39:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #5 received at submit@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

This is the checklist for the 1.2.1 release.

It uses the debbugs "blocking" mechanism, described here:

https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html

I'll start by making this bug depend on a few others:

<https://bugs.gnu.org/46871>
Service manager "init scripts" missing from current-guix

<https://bugs.gnu.org/45704>
Remove Qt 4

Please, add the other tasks that should be completed for the release, so
that we don't forget.

Leo

Added blocking bug(s) 1 and 46871 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 21 Mar 2021 17:42:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 45704 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 21 Mar 2021 17:42:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 46360 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 21 Mar 2021 17:48:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 46829 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:44:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#47297; Package guix. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:15:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #16 received at 47297@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Hi,

On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 at 13:38, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:

> <https://bugs.gnu.org/46871>
> Service manager "init scripts" missing from current-guix
>
> <https://bugs.gnu.org/45704>
> Remove Qt 4

<https://bugs.gnu.org/47239>
bug#47239: Test failure in tests/publish.scm

<https://bugs.gnu.org/47173>
bug#47173 [PATCH 0/1] Remove Clang 3.6.2.

And what do you think to address the 4 security bugs 47144-47140 too?

Cheers,
simon

Added blocking bug(s) 47239 Request was from zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:15:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47173 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:55:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#47297; Package guix. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:07:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #23 received at 47297@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 04:11:20AM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> <https://bugs.gnu.org/47239>
> bug#47239: Test failure in tests/publish.scm
> 
> <https://bugs.gnu.org/47173>
> bug#47173 [PATCH 0/1] Remove Clang 3.6.2.
> 
> And what do you think to address the 4 security bugs 47144-47140 too?

I added all of them to the checklist.

Added blocking bug(s) 47140 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:07:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47141 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:07:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47142 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:07:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47143 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:07:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47144 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:07:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#47297; Package guix. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:29:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #36 received at 47297@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Hi,

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 00:06, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 04:11:20AM +0100, zimoun wrote:

> I added all of them to the checklist.

Thanks.


Another one:

<https://bugs.gnu.org/47097>
<https://bugs.gnu.org/47106>
Eolie and Ephinay in container

(eolie is about a manual example)


Just for the record, more these:

<https://bugs.gnu.org/46871>
Service manager "init scripts" missing from current-guix

<https://bugs.gnu.org/45704>
Remove Qt 4

<https://bugs.gnu.org/47239>
bug#47239: Test failure in tests/publish.scm

<https://bugs.gnu.org/47173>
bug#47173 [PATCH 0/1] Remove Clang 3.6.2.

<https://bugs.gnu.org/47140>
<https://bugs.gnu.org/47141>
<https://bugs.gnu.org/47142>
<https://bugs.gnu.org/47143>
<https://bugs.gnu.org/47144>
Security fixes


Cheers,
simon

Added blocking bug(s) 47097 Request was from zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:29:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47106 Request was from zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:29:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#47297; Package guix. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:17:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #43 received at 47297@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:20:06AM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Another one:
> 
> <https://bugs.gnu.org/47097>
> <https://bugs.gnu.org/47106>
> Eolie and Ephinay in container

This "release checklist" is about fixing bugs that shouldn't go into a
release.

Those bugs look more like bugs that would be nice to fix, but not very
important.

Of course, if somebody fixes them, they will be in the release. But
should they block the release?

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#47297; Package guix. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:04:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #46 received at 47297@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Hi Leo,

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 14:16, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:20:06AM +0100, zimoun wrote:
>> Another one:
>> 
>> <https://bugs.gnu.org/47097>
>> <https://bugs.gnu.org/47106>
>> Eolie and Ephinay in container
>
> This "release checklist" is about fixing bugs that shouldn't go into a
> release.
>
> Those bugs look more like bugs that would be nice to fix, but not very
> important.
>
> Of course, if somebody fixes them, they will be in the release. But
> should they block the release?

To me they are very important because ’eolie’ is in the manual:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
guix environment --preserve='^DISPLAY$' --container --network \
  --expose=/etc/machine-id \
  --expose=/etc/ssl/certs/ \
  --share=$HOME/.local/share/eolie/=$HOME/.local/share/eolie/ \
  --ad-hoc eolie nss-certs dbus --  eolie
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

<https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/guix.html#Invoking-guix-environment>

Therefore, from my point of view, we have only 2 options:

 1- change the example in the manual
 2- fix eolie.

Otherwise, I am not comfortable to release broken examples.  Since
releasing a rolling release is more about advertisement and attract new
users, having broken examples is something really confusing––not to say
unacceptable—–for these new users.

Cheers,
simon

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#47297; Package guix. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:31:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #49 received at 47297@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 07:52:40PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> To me they are very important because ’eolie’ is in the manual:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> guix environment --preserve='^DISPLAY$' --container --network \
>   --expose=/etc/machine-id \
>   --expose=/etc/ssl/certs/ \
>   --share=$HOME/.local/share/eolie/=$HOME/.local/share/eolie/ \
>   --ad-hoc eolie nss-certs dbus --  eolie
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> <https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/guix.html#Invoking-guix-environment>
> 
> 
> Therefore, from my point of view, we have only 2 options:
> 
>  1- change the example in the manual
>  2- fix eolie.

Understood.

> Otherwise, I am not comfortable to release broken examples.  Since
> releasing a rolling release is more about advertisement and attract new
> users, having broken examples is something really confusing––not to say
> unacceptable—–for these new users.

I agree.

Can you add these bugs to the checklist?

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#47297; Package guix. (Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:47:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #52 received at 47297@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 15:30, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 07:52:40PM +0100, zimoun wrote:

>> Therefore, from my point of view, we have only 2 options:
>> 
>>  1- change the example in the manual
>>  2- fix eolie.

[...]

> Can you add these bugs to the checklist?

Well, I think the point #2 is:

        <https://bugs.gnu.org/47097>
        <https://bugs.gnu.org/47106>
        Eolie and Ephinay in container

and they are already blocker, IIRC.

About #1, it will be the last resort solution, IMHO.  We can switch to
Nyxt or any other thing.

Cheers,
simon

Added blocking bug(s) 47407 Request was from zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:13:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:47:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 42129 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 02 Apr 2021 07:47:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 46362 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:21:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47567 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:21:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47569 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 06 Apr 2021 17:46:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47225 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 06 Apr 2021 19:46:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 47142 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 10 Apr 2021 18:48:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47734 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:27:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 33848 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:20:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 47734 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:54:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 47097 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 14 Apr 2021 20:04:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 47144 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:56:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 47106 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 14 Apr 2021 22:00:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 44872 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:01:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47808 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 16 Apr 2021 15:42:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47797 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 16 Apr 2021 15:43:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47744 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 16 Apr 2021 20:13:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47745 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 16 Apr 2021 20:13:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47841 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 17 Apr 2021 17:43:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47734 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 17 Apr 2021 18:31:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 47841 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:19:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47867 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 18 Apr 2021 10:14:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Changed bug title to 'Release 1.3.0 checklist' from 'Release 1.2.1 checklist' Request was from Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 18 Apr 2021 18:46:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 31719 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:47:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47889 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:27:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47759 Request was from Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:07:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47924 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 21 Apr 2021 01:07:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 47713 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 25 Apr 2021 13:01:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 47744 Request was from Mathieu Othacehe <mathieu@meije.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:32:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 47759 Request was from Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 01 May 2021 03:46:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 48173 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 02 May 2021 22:35:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 48313 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 09 May 2021 14:41:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#47297; Package guix. (Mon, 17 May 2021 14:43:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #121 received at 47297@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

1.3.0 has been released!

Blocking bugs #47567 and #44872 were not fixed.

I'm removing their "blocking" status and closing this checklist bug
ticket.

Removed blocking bug(s) 47567 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 17 May 2021 14:44:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 44872 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 17 May 2021 14:44:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

bug closed, send any further explanations to 47297@debbugs.gnu.org and Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 17 May 2021 14:44:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@gnu.org> to internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:24:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Display info messages

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Sat Dec 21 16:52:58 2024; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.