GNU bug report logs

#30041 Issues with GNU Ring on licenses, bundling, configure/build flags and patches

PackageSource(s)Maintainer(s)
guix-patches PTS Buildd Popcon
Reply or subscribe to this bug. View this bug as an mbox, status mbox, or maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to guix-patches@gnu.org:
bug#30041; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 09 Jan 2018 13:14:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@hyperbola.info>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches@gnu.org. (Tue, 09 Jan 2018 13:14:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #5 received at submit@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@hyperbola.info>
To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Subject: Issues with GNU Ring on licenses, bundling, configure/build flags and patches
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 11:12:47 -0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This bug/patch only moves [1] to here, so the progress can be tracked
regardless of archive date.

This is done because the patch might be an improvement to the list of
packages available in GNU Guix.

I have attached a set of recipes (not a patch!) related to GNU Ring and
the dependencies. This attachment is more updated than [2].

However, if you want to test GNU Ring in its unstable state, you must
apply [3] (either directly on your copy of GNU Guix or by making your
own recipes based on the patch) and then use the recipes attached in
this message.

[1]
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=%2Bsubject%3A%7BContinuing+the+work+on+the+recipes+related+to+GNU+Ring%7D&submit=Search%21&idxname=guix-devel&max=20&result=normal&sort=date%3Alate>. Alternatively,
see all messages in
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-03/msg00550.html>
and in
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-07/msg00416.html>.

[2]
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-03/msg00692.html>. An
update I made, also in the discussion related to [1].

[3] <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27475#16>.

[messaging.scm (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
-- 
- https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno
- Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com
  gratis).
- "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre. Por favor, veja formas de se comunicar
  instantaneamente comigo no endereço abaixo.
- Contato: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno#vCard
- Arquivos comuns aceitos (apenas sem DRM): Corel Draw, Microsoft
  Office, MP3, MP4, WMA, WMV.
- Arquivos comuns aceitos e enviados: CSV, GNU Dia, GNU Emacs Org, GNU
  GIMP, Inkscape SVG, JPG, LibreOffice (padrão ODF), OGG, OPUS, PDF
  (apenas sem DRM), PNG, TXT, WEBM.

Added tag(s) help. Request was from Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@hyperbola.info> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 09 Jan 2018 13:49:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) 27475 Request was from Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@hyperbola.info> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 09 Jan 2018 13:49:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to guix-patches@gnu.org:
bug#30041; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 09 Jan 2018 14:31:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #12 received at 30041@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@hyperbola.info>
To: 30041@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30041] Issues with GNU Ring on licenses, bundling, configure/build flags and patches
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 12:30:15 -0200
I have added the "help" tag because:

1. Due to time and other constraints (specially related to job-seeking)
   I no longer have as much time to work on this;

2. I don't know how to fix the issues, specially those related with
   customizations on configure/build flags ([1]) and with patches ([2]);

3. Some patches made by GNU Ring have been sent by me to some of their
   upstream projects but these only accept patches that come from the
   patch authors ([3]).

   An attempt was made to contact the patch authors but so far I got no
   replies ([2]) (perhaps because the authors don't seem to use their
   own issue tracker anymore?);

4. The lack of news and of native support for GnuTLS in pjproject/PJSIP
   ([4]) also makes things harder (because GNU Ring would have to
   maintain their patch to do so);

5. There's no confirmation that the Guix recipes can keep using these
   patches and configure/build flag customizations.


[1] <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/ring/2017-03/msg00005.html>.

[2] <https://tuleap.ring.cx/plugins/tracker/?aid=1546>.

[3]
<http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2017-June/020030.html>.

[4]
<http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2017-April/019937.html>.

2018-01-09T11:12:47-0200 Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> This bug/patch only moves [1] to here, so the progress can be tracked
> regardless of archive date.
>
> This is done because the patch might be an improvement to the list of
> packages available in GNU Guix.
>
> I have attached a set of recipes (not a patch!) related to GNU Ring and
> the dependencies. This attachment is more updated than [2].
>
> However, if you want to test GNU Ring in its unstable state, you must
> apply [3] (either directly on your copy of GNU Guix or by making your
> own recipes based on the patch) and then use the recipes attached in
> this message.
>
> [1]
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=%2Bsubject%3A%7BContinuing+the+work+on+the+recipes+related+to+GNU+Ring%7D&submit=Search%21&idxname=guix-devel&max=20&result=normal&sort=date%3Alate>. Alternatively,
> see all messages in
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-03/msg00550.html>
> and in
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-07/msg00416.html>.
>
> [2]
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-03/msg00692.html>. An
> update I made, also in the discussion related to [1].
>
> [3] <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27475#16>.




Reply sent to Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:12:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Notification sent to Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@hyperbola.info>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:12:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #17 received at 30041-done@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
To: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@hyperbola.info>
Cc: 30041-done@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30041] Issues with GNU Ring on licenses, bundling, configure/build flags and patches
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:11:34 -0500
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
There is a new wip-ring branch in our Git repo on Savannah:

https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?h=wip-ring

Considering this new effort to package Ring / Jami, and the fact that a
lot of time has passed without any activity on these patches, I'm
closing this bug ticket.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@gnu.org> to internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:24:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Tue Nov 5 08:41:17 2024; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.