[PATCH] gnu: rust: make rust 1.25.0 build reproducible

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Jakub Kądziołka
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • Nikolai Merinov
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Nikolai Merinov
Severity
normal

Debbugs page

N
N
Nikolai Merinov wrote on 13 Jul 2018 13:15
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)
87a7qlk6tx.fsf@member.fsf.org
* gnu/packages/rust.scm (rust-1.25): switch back to llvm@3.9 still builds with
llvm@6.0 is not reproducible. Remove all llvm@6.0 related twicks.
(rust-1.26): switch to llvm@6.0 still rust-1.26 can build reproducible
binaries with new llvm release. Enable llvm@5.0 related twicks.
---
gnu/packages/rust.scm | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (73 lines)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/rust.scm b/gnu/packages/rust.scm
index 28bffb44b..1095070eb 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/rust.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/rust.scm
@@ -545,10 +545,6 @@ jemalloc = \"" jemalloc "/lib/libjemalloc_pic.a" "\"
"0baxjr99311lvwdq0s38bipbnj72pn6fgbk6lcq7j555xq53mxpf")))
(package
(inherit base-rust)
- (inputs
- ;; Use LLVM 6.0
- (alist-replace "llvm" (list llvm)
- (package-inputs base-rust)))
(arguments
(substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments base-rust)
((#:phases phases)
@@ -559,23 +555,6 @@ jemalloc = \"" jemalloc "/lib/libjemalloc_pic.a" "\"
;; This test wants to update the crate index.
(("fn no_index_update") "#[ignore]\nfn no_index_update"))
#t))
- (add-after 'configure 'enable-codegen-tests
- (lambda _
- (substitute* "config.toml"
- (("codegen-tests = false") ""))
- #t))
- (replace 'patch-aarch64-test
- (lambda _
- (substitute* "src/librustc_metadata/dynamic_lib.rs"
- ;; This test is known to fail on aarch64 and powerpc64le:
- ;; https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45410
- (("fn test_loading_cosine") "#[ignore]\nfn test_loading_cosine"))
- ;; This test fails on aarch64 with llvm@6.0:
- ;; https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49807
- ;; other possible solution:
- ;; https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/47688
- (delete-file "src/test/debuginfo/by-value-self-argument-in-trait-impl.rs")
- #t))
(delete 'ignore-glibc-2.27-incompatible-test))))))))
(define-public rust-1.26
@@ -585,6 +564,10 @@ jemalloc = \"" jemalloc "/lib/libjemalloc_pic.a" "\"
#:patches '("rust-coresimd-doctest.patch"))))
(package
(inherit base-rust)
+ (inputs
+ ;; Use LLVM 6.0
+ (alist-replace "llvm" (list llvm)
+ (package-inputs base-rust)))
(arguments
(substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments base-rust)
((#:phases phases)
@@ -624,6 +607,20 @@ jemalloc = \"" jemalloc "/lib/libjemalloc_pic.a" "\"
(substitute* "src/tools/cargo/tests/testsuite/generate_lockfile.rs"
;; This test wants to update the crate index.
(("fn no_index_update") "#[ignore]\nfn no_index_update"))
+ #t))
+ (add-after 'patch-aarch64-test 'patch-aarch64-llvm6-test
+ (lambda _
+ ;; This test fails on aarch64 with llvm@6.0:
+ ;; https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49807
+ ;; other possible solution:
+ ;; https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/47688
+ (delete-file "src/test/debuginfo/by-value-self-argument-in-trait-impl.rs")
+ #t))
+ (add-after 'configure 'enable-codegen-tests
+ (lambda* _
+ (substitute* "config.toml"
+ ;; codegen test should pass with LLVM 6
+ (("codegen-tests = false") ""))
#t)))))))))
(define-public rust
--
2.17.1
N
N
Nikolai Merinov wrote on 20 Jul 2018 13:21
(address . 32227@debbugs.gnu.org)
876019k698.fsf_-_@member.fsf.org
Hi,

I tried to configure how rust use llvm, but I did not succeed in
it. Looks like llvm@6.0 usage was fixed fully only in rust 1.26.

I already checked once that 1.25 and 1.26 rust releases is reproducible
in my environment with llvm@3.9 and llvm@6.0 respectively. When I posted
this patch I restarted my builds with "--rounds=2".

Regards,
Nikolai
N
N
Nikolai Merinov wrote on 22 Jul 2018 02:55
(address . 32227@debbugs.gnu.org)
877eln61cv.fsf@member.fsf.org
Hi,

Please, do not merge. Change rejected. With this change 1.27.0 build
still not reproducible. I should try to figure out which llvm
compilation options make builds non-reproducible.

Regards,
Nikolai

Nikolai Merinov <nikolai.merinov@member.fsf.org> writes:

Toggle quote (11 lines)
> Hi,
>
> I tried to configure how rust use llvm, but I did not succeed in
> it. Looks like llvm@6.0 usage was fixed fully only in rust 1.26.
>
> I already checked once that 1.25 and 1.26 rust releases is reproducible
> in my environment with llvm@3.9 and llvm@6.0 respectively. When I posted
> this patch I restarted my builds with "--rounds=2".
>
> Regards,
> Nikolai
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 21 Aug 2018 14:19
Re: [bug#32227] [PATCH] gnu: rust: make rust 1.25.0 build reproducible
(name . Nikolai Merinov)(address . nikolai.merinov@member.fsf.org)(address . 32227@debbugs.gnu.org)
87ftz7mn89.fsf@gnu.org
Hello Nikolai,

Nikolai Merinov <nikolai.merinov@member.fsf.org> skribis:

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> Please, do not merge. Change rejected. With this change 1.27.0 build
> still not reproducible. I should try to figure out which llvm
> compilation options make builds non-reproducible.

Does the problem still applies to 1.27.0 as currently available in
master?

Thanks,
Ludo’.
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 21 Aug 2018 14:19
(name . Nikolai Merinov)(address . nikolai.merinov@member.fsf.org)(address . 32227@debbugs.gnu.org)
87efermn81.fsf@gnu.org
Hello Nikolai,

Nikolai Merinov <nikolai.merinov@member.fsf.org> skribis:

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> Please, do not merge. Change rejected. With this change 1.27.0 build
> still not reproducible. I should try to figure out which llvm
> compilation options make builds non-reproducible.

Does the problem still apply to 1.27.0 as currently available in master?

Thanks,
Ludo’.
N
N
Nikolai Merinov wrote on 23 Sep 2018 14:38
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 32227@debbugs.gnu.org)
8736tzlws1.fsf@member.fsf.org
Hello Ludo,

Sorry for long answer. I have no chance to continue ivestigation last
month, but I'll want to provide my old finding:

1. Rust 1.25 build cargo binary (but not rustc itself) in
non-reproducible manner when compiled with llvm-6.0 and llvm-6.1. In
both cases we got non-reproducible code for next functions:
"<env_logger::Logger as log::Log>::log", "git2::panic::check",
"curl::easy::handler::ssl_ctx_cb".
2. Rust 1.26 with llvm-6.0 build is reproducible regardless of which
rustc 1.25 (with llvm-6.0 or llvm-3.9) was used to bootstrap it.
3. Rust 1.27.0 and Rust 1.27.2 again build rustc itself in reproducible
manner, while "cargo" binary differ build to build. I observed
non-reproducible code in "git2::panic::check" function and in
".gcc_except_table" section of resulting binary.

In attachements you can find patch to move rust-1.25 to llvm-3.9, and
patch to update Rust 1.27 to 1.27.2.
From: Nikolai Merinov <nikolai.merinov@member.fsf.org>
To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: rust: make rust 1.25.0 build reproducible

* gnu/packages/rust.scm (rust-1.25): switch back to llvm@3.9 still builds with
llvm@6.0 is not reproducible. Remove all llvm@6.0 related twicks.
(rust-1.26): switch to llvm@6.0 still rust-1.26 can build reproducible
binaries with new llvm release. Enable llvm@5.0 related twicks.
---
gnu/packages/rust.scm | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (73 lines)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/rust.scm b/gnu/packages/rust.scm
index 28bffb44b..1095070eb 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/rust.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/rust.scm
@@ -545,10 +545,6 @@ jemalloc = \"" jemalloc "/lib/libjemalloc_pic.a" "\"
"0baxjr99311lvwdq0s38bipbnj72pn6fgbk6lcq7j555xq53mxpf")))
(package
(inherit base-rust)
- (inputs
- ;; Use LLVM 6.0
- (alist-replace "llvm" (list llvm)
- (package-inputs base-rust)))
(arguments
(substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments base-rust)
((#:phases phases)
@@ -559,23 +555,6 @@ jemalloc = \"" jemalloc "/lib/libjemalloc_pic.a" "\"
;; This test wants to update the crate index.
(("fn no_index_update") "#[ignore]\nfn no_index_update"))
#t))
- (add-after 'configure 'enable-codegen-tests
- (lambda _
- (substitute* "config.toml"
- (("codegen-tests = false") ""))
- #t))
- (replace 'patch-aarch64-test
- (lambda _
- (substitute* "src/librustc_metadata/dynamic_lib.rs"
- ;; This test is known to fail on aarch64 and powerpc64le:
- ;; https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45410
- (("fn test_loading_cosine") "#[ignore]\nfn test_loading_cosine"))
- ;; This test fails on aarch64 with llvm@6.0:
- ;; https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49807
- ;; other possible solution:
- ;; https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/47688
- (delete-file "src/test/debuginfo/by-value-self-argument-in-trait-impl.rs")
- #t))
(delete 'ignore-glibc-2.27-incompatible-test))))))))
(define-public rust-1.26
@@ -585,6 +564,10 @@ jemalloc = \"" jemalloc "/lib/libjemalloc_pic.a" "\"
#:patches '("rust-coresimd-doctest.patch"))))
(package
(inherit base-rust)
+ (inputs
+ ;; Use LLVM 6.0
+ (alist-replace "llvm" (list llvm)
+ (package-inputs base-rust)))
(arguments
(substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments base-rust)
((#:phases phases)
@@ -624,6 +607,20 @@ jemalloc = \"" jemalloc "/lib/libjemalloc_pic.a" "\"
(substitute* "src/tools/cargo/tests/testsuite/generate_lockfile.rs"
;; This test wants to update the crate index.
(("fn no_index_update") "#[ignore]\nfn no_index_update"))
+ #t))
+ (add-after 'patch-aarch64-test 'patch-aarch64-llvm6-test
+ (lambda _
+ ;; This test fails on aarch64 with llvm@6.0:
+ ;; https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49807
+ ;; other possible solution:
+ ;; https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/47688
+ (delete-file "src/test/debuginfo/by-value-self-argument-in-trait-impl.rs")
+ #t))
+ (add-after 'configure 'enable-codegen-tests
+ (lambda* _
+ (substitute* "config.toml"
+ ;; codegen test should pass with LLVM 6
+ (("codegen-tests = false") ""))
#t)))))))))
(define-public rust
--
2.17.1
Toggle diff (15 lines)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/rust.scm b/gnu/packages/rust.scm
index 0695f8c7d..4bc8d1d88 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/rust.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/rust.scm
@@ -631,8 +631,8 @@ jemalloc = \"" jemalloc "/lib/libjemalloc_pic.a" "\"
(define-public rust
(let ((base-rust
- (rust-bootstrapped-package rust-1.26 "1.27.0"
- "089d7rhw55zpvnw71dj8vil6qrylvl4xjr4m8bywjj83d4zq1f9c"
+ (rust-bootstrapped-package rust-1.26 "1.27.2"
+ "0pg1s37bhx9zqbynxyydq5j6q7kij9vxkcv8maz0m25prm88r0cs"
#:patches
'("rust-coresimd-doctest.patch"
"rust-bootstrap-stage0-test.patch"))))
Regards,
Nikolai

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

Toggle quote (12 lines)
> Hello Nikolai,
>
> Nikolai Merinov <nikolai.merinov@member.fsf.org> skribis:
>
>> Please, do not merge. Change rejected. With this change 1.27.0 build
>> still not reproducible. I should try to figure out which llvm
>> compilation options make builds non-reproducible.
>
> Does the problem still apply to 1.27.0 as currently available in master?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
J
J
Jakub Kądziołka wrote on 23 Feb 2020 06:27
closing
(address . 32227-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
20200223142717.h3mvval7iru4o4h4@gravity
These patches seem to have been made obsolete by commit
e027a494fd5e6025e645ce9f36cccca39a77d327 - closing.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=dgmf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Closed
J
J
Jakub Kądziołka wrote on 23 Feb 2020 06:29
add wontfix tag
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
20200223142934.hwsktvj6alf64cpo@gravity
tags 32227 wontfix
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=mlXs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 32227@patchwise.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 32227
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch