GNU bug report logs

#78257 Request for merging "emacs-team" branch

PackageSource(s)Maintainer(s)
guix-patches PTS Buildd Popcon
Full log

Message #49 received at 78257@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 78257) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2025 17:26:46 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 25 13:26:46 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38541 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1uUTtW-0003b4-0R
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:26:46 -0400
Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:35580 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rutherther@ditigal.xyz>)
 id 1uUTtS-0003aD-VS
 for 78257@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:26:43 -0400
Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id fb1af745
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); 
 Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:26:36 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rutherther <rutherther@ditigal.xyz>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Request for merging "emacs-team" branch
In-Reply-To: <aFwt_IkQwac3wak9@jurong>
References: <aE7zATuaWWbI6_Bb@jurong> <87frfneol5.fsf@ditigal.xyz>
 <aFwt_IkQwac3wak9@jurong>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 19:26:34 +0200
Message-ID: <87bjqbohpx.fsf@ditigal.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz;
 i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1750872396; h=from : to : cc
 : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id :
 mime-version : content-type : from;
 bh=RwpPG/GSoqmjtd2j9g/vYGbiAkuT2IGtKGXTLzOLfbU=;
 b=pfEZJkBP25b20nWmGbuSCfYJqOUUQV5H9qzkIoGkZPfxCxEjsNydH1HynkEB6/Jk2yeP2
 Qy9Vqb35PLWvoKYln5E8sbPg2BjVyaJcPDJ/36s4eIHOdvkvTshRXQj7ofCYfReKtF4hgYi
 NNI+Epj+wfbpx68imc3mtIQM1b7a1n8=
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes: > Am Wed, Jun 25, 2025
 at 07:08:22PM +0200 schrieb Rutherther: >> I am wondering... does this policy
 still make sense with codeberg and >> PRs? If a person knows what team their
 change goes on, and th [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
 [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 78257
Cc: ngraves@ngraves.fr, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>,
 78257@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes: > Am Wed, Jun 25, 2025
    at 07:08:22PM +0200 schrieb Rutherther: >> I am wondering... does this policy
    still make sense with codeberg and >> PRs? If a person knows what team their
    change goes on, and th [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

> Am Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 07:08:22PM +0200 schrieb Rutherther:
>> I am wondering... does this policy still make sense with codeberg and
>> PRs? If a person knows what team their change goes on, and they know it
>> can't go directly to master, wouldn't it be beneficial to have a branch
>> to open against?
>
> You can always just reopen it. The idea behind the policy is to not have
> stray branches of which one does not remember that they have already
> been merged.

People who do not have access to the repository cannot reopen it. That
was my point.

>
> Andreas




Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Wed Sep 10 20:57:44 2025; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.