GNU bug report logs

#76899 Request for merging "c++-team" branch

PackageSource(s)Maintainer(s)
guix-patches PTS Buildd Popcon
Full log

Message #103 received at 76899@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 76899) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2025 14:52:23 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 21 10:52:22 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1udrsM-0003wi-Fv
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2025 10:52:22 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:55092)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>)
 id 1udrsI-0003vp-HG; Mon, 21 Jul 2025 10:52:19 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137C021C;
 Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:52:09 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr;
	none
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at hera.aquilenet.fr
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id ElYKEivw0sU9; Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:52:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jurong (86.56.141.77.rev.sfr.net [77.141.56.86])
 by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8F86143;
 Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:52:06 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:52:05 +0200
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
To: Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com>
Subject: Re: After the merge is before the merge
Message-ID: <aH5UFaS3eGGGO20P@jurong>
References: <aHqc5o9rYnO8gLFL@jurong>
 <CA+3U0Z=sh6OaMQ3UOnj9jQQn-90ZjyDn=gxfG12B-9XrTP0vPw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+3U0Z=sh6OaMQ3UOnj9jQQn-90ZjyDn=gxfG12B-9XrTP0vPw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.03 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM(-3.00)[-1.000];
 BAYES_HAM(-2.93)[99.71%]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[];
 MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];
 RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[];
 TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
 FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[debbugs.gnu.org,gmail.com,envs.net,cbaines.net]
X-Rspamd-Action: no action
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 137C021C
X-Rspamd-Server: hera
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 76899
Cc: 76044@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>,
 Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>, iyzsong@envs.net, 76899@debbugs.gnu.org,
 78689@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hello Greg,

Am Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 10:05:14AM -0400 schrieb Greg Hogan:
> Substitute availability on master is shown as 33.1% for armhf-linux
> and 78.1% for i686-linux. I'm not noticing much improvement in those
> numbers, but I can track this better now that I have recorded a point
> in time.
> 
> This seems like a less than optimal behavior for the system to shut
> down building on primary architectures for team branches when the
> secondary architectures have large numbers of blocked builds,
> presumably due to the recent core-packages-team merge.

indeed this is a problem! In particular now since I think the number
of buildable packages has gone below the limit of 80% on these two
architectures, so we will never reach this barrier. (I deduce this from
the numbers not going up.) However, on i686 I think we are on our way to
above 80% with all the recent changes on master.

I have submitted a PR here:
   https://codeberg.org/guix/qa-frontpage/pulls/8
and am working on integrating and deploying it.

The qt-team branch has also reopened and gone to the front of the queue,
since it had been waiting longer and just been suspended while waiting
for core-packages-team, on which it depends, to let other branches go to
the front.

The c++-team branch has started on CI as well:
   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/c++-team
but I am rather puzzled by the outcome.
The page itself shows an enormous number of failed packages in the red
box (almost all of them, plus some that are still in progress); when
clicking on the red box, I find packages such as ocaml that failed their
test phase with 0 failed tests. On the other hand, when clicking on the
dashboard (the monitor symbol to the right), almost all packages are
either green or transparent, and when one clicks on a transparent dot,
it shows the build as scheduled. But I know very little about CI.

All of qt-team, c++-team and nss-updates are accessible from CI as well,
so as soon as one of them is seen to be ready there, it can be pushed
to master.

Andreas





Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Wed Sep 10 10:42:34 2025; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.