GNU bug report logs

#53214 Release 1.4.0 progress

PackageSource(s)Maintainer(s)
guix PTS Buildd Popcon
Reply or subscribe to this bug. View this bug as an mbox, status mbox, or maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#53214; Package guix. (Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:33:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Acknowledgement sent to Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix@gnu.org. (Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:33:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #5 received at submit@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
To: bug-guix@gnu.org
Subject: Release 1.4.0 progress
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:32:05 +0100
Hello!

This pseudo-bug is here to keep track of bug fixes and patch series we
aim to address for 1.4.0.

To add an issue as “required” for 1.4.0, mark this bug as “blocked” by
this issue (this is ‘C block NUMBER RET’ in debbugs.el).

Ludo’.

Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:42:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 53210 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:43:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 52828 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 13 Jan 2022 10:56:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 52891 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:28:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 52752 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:40:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 52943 Request was from Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 16 Jan 2022 01:03:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 53480 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:32:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 53506 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:06:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 53544 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 26 Jan 2022 04:19:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 53541 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 26 Jan 2022 04:19:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#53214; Package guix. (Wed, 26 Jan 2022 04:21:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #28 received at 53214@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 53214@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53214: Release 1.4.0 progress
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 23:20:39 -0500
There are new crashes in the installer:

https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53541
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53544

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#53214; Package guix. (Sat, 29 Jan 2022 21:12:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #31 received at 53214@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 53214@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53214: Release 1.4.0 progress
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:11:25 -0500
The build farm is having trouble building Guix for i686-linux. In fact,
it hasn't successfully completed the 'guix' job in weeks:

https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53463

And building the guix package does not work on aarch64, also for weeks:

https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52943

Finally, should we consider retiring the armhf port in 1.4.0? It seems
that we have stopped trying to build for it:

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=guix+spec%3Amaster+system%3Aarmhf-linux

Added blocking bug(s) 1 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 29 Jan 2022 21:13:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 53463 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 29 Jan 2022 21:13:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#53214; Package guix. (Sun, 30 Jan 2022 00:23:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #38 received at 53214@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 53214@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53214: Release 1.4.0 progress
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:22:21 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 2022-01-29, Leo Famulari wrote:
> The build farm is having trouble building Guix for i686-linux. In fact,
> it hasn't successfully completed the 'guix' job in weeks:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53463
>
> And building the guix package does not work on aarch64, also for weeks:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52943

It does work on my aarch64 machine as of
1ef7a03a148cf5f83ab1820444f6bd50d8e732d1 and more recently
f8bfb2d85682dcabe56a4b1b0f25d566a0abbd2b, but not sure why it's not
building on the build farm...


> Finally, should we consider retiring the armhf port in 1.4.0? It seems
> that we have stopped trying to build for it:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=guix+spec%3Amaster+system%3Aarmhf-linux

In a similar vein, aarch64 substitutes are in pretty bad shape... and
the architecture as a whole is a bit hard to keep up with; there are
some pretty obscure and difficult to triage bugs here and there.

I'm not sure what the qualities of a release-worthy architecture are,
but aarch64 is definitely suffering badly ever since the core-updates
merge and the merge of the 1.4 branch into master, which required a lot
of rebuilds...


live well,
  vagrant

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#53214; Package guix. (Sun, 30 Jan 2022 01:01:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #41 received at 53214@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@kolabnow.com>
To: 53214@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: bug#53214: Release 1.4.0 progress
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 22:00:18 -0300
Hello,

Em sábado, 29 de janeiro de 2022, às 21:22:21 -03, Vagrant Cascadian 
escreveu:
> On 2022-01-29, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > The build farm is having trouble building Guix for i686-linux. In fact,
> > it hasn't successfully completed the 'guix' job in weeks:
> > 
> > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53463
> > 
> > And building the guix package does not work on aarch64, also for weeks:
> > 
> > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52943
> 
> It does work on my aarch64 machine as of
> 1ef7a03a148cf5f83ab1820444f6bd50d8e732d1 and more recently
> f8bfb2d85682dcabe56a4b1b0f25d566a0abbd2b, but not sure why it's not
> building on the build farm...

A couple of weeks ago guixp9 wasn’t doing powerpc64le builds either.
I did a “guix pull && guix upgrade” (which upgraded the version of Cuirass 
installed) and restarted the Cuirass worker then things got back on track 
again. I don’t know why...

-- 
Thanks,
Thiago

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#53214; Package guix. (Tue, 01 Feb 2022 08:35:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #44 received at 53214@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: 53214@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53214: Release 1.4.0 progress
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 09:34:35 +0100
Hi,

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> The build farm is having trouble building Guix for i686-linux. In fact,
> it hasn't successfully completed the 'guix' job in weeks:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53463

(This issue title doesn’t mention i686.)  I’m looking at it, though a
bit slowly because I’ve been busy with other things:

  https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53506

> And building the guix package does not work on aarch64, also for weeks:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52943

Ah, I thought this had been fixed with Chris Marusich’s commits but
apparently not?

> Finally, should we consider retiring the armhf port in 1.4.0? It seems
> that we have stopped trying to build for it:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=guix+spec%3Amaster+system%3Aarmhf-linux

The “armhf-linux” box was unchecked, not sure why.  I’ve re-added it and
we’ll see.  (For the record, anyone with access to berlin or with a
certificate can do it via the Cuirass web interface.)

Bordeaux.guix does have binaries:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix weather -s armhf-linux coreutils guile grep sed
computing 4 package derivations for armhf-linux...
looking for 6 store items on https://ci.guix.gnu.org...
https://ci.guix.gnu.org
  0.0% substitutes available (0 out of 6)
  unknown substitute sizes
  0.0 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
  0.042 seconds per request (0.2 seconds in total)
  23.6 requests per second

  0.0% (0 out of 6) of the missing items are queued
  at least 1,000 queued builds
      aarch64-linux: 1000 (100.0%)
  build rate: 17.64 builds per hour
      i686-linux: 4.74 builds per hour
      x86_64-linux: 9.23 builds per hour
      powerpc64le-linux: 3.69 builds per hour
looking for 6 store items on https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org...
https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org
  100.0% substitutes available (6 out of 6)
  23.1 MiB of nars (compressed)
  113.8 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
  0.034 seconds per request (0.1 seconds in total)
  29.3 requests per second
  (continuous integration information unavailable)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Overall it’s not a great situation to be in, but I think we should be
able to address it.  Usually I think it’s safer to merge ‘core-updates’
only after “make assert-binaries-available” passes.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Added blocking bug(s) 49508 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 03 Feb 2022 17:45:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Information forwarded to bug-guix@gnu.org:
bug#53214; Package guix. (Thu, 03 Feb 2022 17:48:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Message #49 received at 53214@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 53214@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53214: Release 1.4.0 progress
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 12:46:59 -0500
I suggest we fix #49508 "Implement --allow-insecure-transport for `guix
pull`" before the next release:

https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49508

Added blocking bug(s) 53706 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 03 Feb 2022 18:40:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 53194 Request was from Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 04 Feb 2022 17:05:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 54003 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:01:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 54055 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 02 Mar 2022 10:40:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 54666 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 01 Apr 2022 11:45:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 55360 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 11 May 2022 09:28:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 55361 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 11 May 2022 13:44:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 53594 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 11 May 2022 20:12:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 55549 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 20 May 2022 21:36:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 56209 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 27 Jun 2022 21:52:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 57068 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 09 Aug 2022 09:48:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 57232 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 05 Sep 2022 13:09:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 57827 Request was from Mathieu Othacehe <mathieu@meije.mail-host-address-is-not-set> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:38:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 57730 Request was from Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:13:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 58661 Request was from Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:13:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 58732 Request was from Mathieu Othacehe <mathieu@meije.mail-host-address-is-not-set> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 23 Oct 2022 10:31:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 58923 Request was from Mathieu Othacehe <mathieu@meije.mail-host-address-is-not-set> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 31 Oct 2022 10:31:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 58926 Request was from Mathieu Othacehe <mathieu@meije.mail-host-address-is-not-set> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:37:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 49508 Request was from Mathieu Othacehe <mathieu@meije.mail-host-address-is-not-set> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 01 Nov 2022 17:33:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 57068 Request was from Mathieu Othacehe <mathieu@meije.mail-host-address-is-not-set> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 01 Nov 2022 17:42:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 56290 Request was from Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 04 Nov 2022 17:50:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 58221 Request was from Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 09 Nov 2022 12:59:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Removed blocking bug(s) 53594 Request was from Mathieu Othacehe <mathieu@meije.mail-host-address-is-not-set> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:34:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Added blocking bug(s) 59519 Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:56:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

bug closed, send any further explanations to 53214@debbugs.gnu.org and Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> Request was from Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> to control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 20 Dec 2022 22:24:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs@gnu.org> to internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:24:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Sat Apr 19 07:26:35 2025; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.