GNU bug report logs

#52359 [PATCH] gnu: python2-bottle: Remove package.

PackageSource(s)Maintainer(s)
guix-patches PTS Buildd Popcon
Full log

Message #11 received at 52359@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 52359) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 22:58:26 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 19 17:58:26 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48462 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1mz58M-0001IE-8l
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:58:26 -0500
Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:37565)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <jgart@dismail.de>) id 1mz58K-0001I1-R2
 for 52359@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:58:25 -0500
Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 4acf2362;
 Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:58:18 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date
 :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=
 20190914; bh=+xJ1tnJbguMTD+pHgHhvdt2hpUueO/JV2ughNJpwcGo=; b=pFY
 e2gakmX9lsGqzmbXiDU4IiKqI87DsqLO4wR97uTBQ4xFGr4+eQuBIzxOkUxvoueZ
 RZ581zeJfAN5U56b3OfHacb9gRdSvOtXZmtoZColJtXgk0j8pF0/Ay16lbXMK/Dl
 KpoHqdtk3ruFQuoWjK/F/TPpYauQpjF28oJUSlogsc0TirhgCyzS35Piw6WBUEsu
 BspQTGjeirbWaEH3eJRm0Lj55fZwGRbgUtRAaXpfV5BdRdxzROGJ6KlmCSDk1gqO
 BSdfbd46AzM83QTFB/gZ4DT6dLXQwxDw44K4ZBdnOsRWVzRjfVZmSUlwbQThYVlR
 xJ7FWTL4iTpPVpRLPpg==
Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (<unknown> [10.240.26.12])
 by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8b5297af;
 Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:58:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f49c6dfe;
 Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:58:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b5b8f694
 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); 
 Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:58:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:58:16 -0500
Message-ID: <20211219175816.GB5741@gac>
From: jgart <jgart@dismail.de>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#52359: [PATCH] gnu: python2-bottle: Remove package.
In-Reply-To: <87bl1cmdvh.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20211207210007.1058-1-jgart@dismail.de> <87bl1cmdvh.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52359
Cc: 52359@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:25:06 +0100 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> jgart <jgart@dismail.de> skribis:
> 
> > * gnu/packages/python-web.scm (python2-bottle): Delete variable.
> 
> Apparently it still has users so we can’t remove it yet:

Hi Ludo,

Thanks for the review!

The best way to check is with `guix refresh --list-dependent python2-bottle`?

Or, you're referring to the fact that there are still users using the
python2 version of bottle itself?

Also, when upgrading a package, what is your workflow for testing and making 
sure you don't break a dependent package?

Do you also build all packages listed in the output of 
`guix refresh --list-dependent package-name` before sending a patch?

My experience with this issue is when I updated python-jedi recently. 
I sent the patch.  It got accepted. (Un)relatedly, I tried installing
bpython a day later and bpython was broken. My first guess is that the
upgrade of python-jedi broke the current version of bpython in master. I
wasn't thinking about bpython when I was upgrading python-jedi.

Could any of the above be mentioned in the cookbook or the manual? Excuse me if
I TDLR'ed that part.

Any advice is much appreciated.

> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ ./pre-inst-env  guix refresh -l python2-bottle
> Building the following 2 packages would ensure 3 dependent packages are rebuilt: h-client@0.0a0-138 virtaal@0.7.1
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> Ludo’.




Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Fri Oct 25 23:31:09 2024; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.