#47259 python-pillow-simd package vulnerable to at least CVE-2021-25293

Message #5 received at submit@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@zaclys.net>

To: bug-guix@gnu.org

Subject: python-pillow-simd package vulnerable to at least CVE-2021-25293

Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:37:09 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello!

pillow-simd is a fork of pillow (
https://github.com/uploadcare/pillow-simd), it's currently still at
version 7.x and it does not seem like it backports security patches
from pillow.

$ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l python-pillow-simd
No dependents other than itself: python-pillow-simd@7.1.2

Do we remove it? Do we want to commit to backporting/applying all fixes
from python-pillow back in python-pillow-simd ourselves (I don't)?

Léo

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #12 received at 47259-done@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>

To: Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@zaclys.net>

Cc: 47259-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Subject: Re: bug#47259: python-pillow-simd package vulnerable to at least CVE-2021-25293

Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:57:55 -0400

Hi Léo,

Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@zaclys.net> writes:

> Hello!
>
> pillow-simd is a fork of pillow (
> https://github.com/uploadcare/pillow-simd), it's currently still at
> version 7.x and it does not seem like it backports security patches
> from pillow.

Thanks for the heads-up; our package is currently at 9.0.0, and I've
just updated it to 9.0.0.post1.

Closing.

Maxim

Message #15 received at 47259-done@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>

To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>, Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@zaclys.net>

Cc: 47259-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Subject: Re: bug#47259: python-pillow-simd package vulnerable to at least CVE-2021-25293

Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:39:25 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Maxim Cournoyer schreef op di 22-03-2022 om 22:57 [-0400]:
> Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@zaclys.net> writes:
> 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > pillow-simd is a fork of pillow (
> > https://github.com/uploadcare/pillow-simd), it's currently still at
> > version 7.x and it does not seem like it backports security patches
> > from pillow.
> 
> Thanks for the heads-up; our package is currently at 9.0.0, and I've
> just updated it to 9.0.0.post1.

Something went wrong
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=4a828263791ebb8ed8f8104e015a8f467008fc76>:
the version in the version field contains a "v" prefix which is dropped
in Guix.
Additionally, the package name is missing from the commit message,
though that cannot be corrected retroactively.

WDYT of removing the "v", and changing the "commit" field to

  (commit (string-append "v" version))

?

Greetings,
Maxime.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #18 received at 47259-done@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>

To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>

Cc: Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@zaclys.net>, 47259-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Subject: Re: bug#47259: python-pillow-simd package vulnerable to at least CVE-2021-25293

Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:13:32 -0400

Hi,

Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer schreef op di 22-03-2022 om 22:57 [-0400]:
>> Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@zaclys.net> writes:
>> 
>> > Hello!
>> > 
>> > pillow-simd is a fork of pillow (
>> > https://github.com/uploadcare/pillow-simd), it's currently still at
>> > version 7.x and it does not seem like it backports security patches
>> > from pillow.
>> 
>> Thanks for the heads-up; our package is currently at 9.0.0, and I've
>> just updated it to 9.0.0.post1.
>
> Something went wrong
> <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=4a828263791ebb8ed8f8104e015a8f467008fc76>:
> the version in the version field contains a "v" prefix which is dropped
> in Guix.
> Additionally, the package name is missing from the commit message,
> though that cannot be corrected retroactively.

Hum, apologies, it must have been late :-).

> WDYT of removing the "v", and changing the "commit" field to
>
>   (commit (string-append "v" version))
>

I see that Nicholas has already fixed it; thank you!

Maxim

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.