#46362 got unexpected path `Backtrace:' from substituter

Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2021 12:43:00 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 07 07:42:59 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47037 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1l8jOy-0001FT-GS
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 07:42:59 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36800)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <all_but_last@163.com>) id 1l8jOx-0001FM-48
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 07:42:56 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54780)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <all_but_last@163.com>)
 id 1l8jOu-0003If-G4
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 07:42:54 -0500
Received: from m12-14.163.com ([220.181.12.14]:57369)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <all_but_last@163.com>)
 id 1l8jOf-0005L3-BM
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 07:42:45 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com;
 s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=sAAAU
 xsup8GtfT+OmjMo/bM0R6NLgDWWyrcBQbc9NzY=; b=dlPI3IcBoTuKkaAjXi2vl
 oaszm/TDyBvSWCa115CgBmnupe98ZlvubzaH4cTnovBZVWG1BwCh7/3O359Dbio3
 5Bm7u+mghJ9eVCOfQJsIFZN3gjyqKHdF4osJyJEhZHZi5M4FAzjin+lzpJO0t84x
 FzrIpKqNDc6ujTEuURTeKI=
Received: from asus-laptop (unknown [113.100.122.217])
 by smtp10 (Coremail) with SMTP id DsCowAAn8Hgn4B9gcoKcjw--.1942S2;
 Sun, 07 Feb 2021 20:42:16 +0800 (CST)
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.14; emacs 27.1
From: Zhu Zihao <all_but_last@163.com>
To: bug-guix@gnu.org
Subject: got unexpected path `Backtrace:' from substituter
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 20:42:10 +0800
Message-ID: <86a6sgcan1.fsf@163.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-CM-TRANSID: DsCowAAn8Hgn4B9gcoKcjw--.1942S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoW7JF4kCrW5tF45Xw15WF45ZFb_yoW3urg_Wr
 1ay3y5Xry8Cr47Xay8WFW3Jr97C3y8X3Wqyr4YgrnrCa4jv3W5JFs7uryrXa43WF4agFyj
 vw43K34DAa1SqjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT
 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU0XJ55UUUUU==
X-Originating-IP: [113.100.122.217]
X-CM-SenderInfo: pdoosuxxwbztlvw6il2tof0z/1tbitAkyr1SIkXVumQAAsv
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=220.181.12.14; envelope-from=all_but_last@163.com;
 helo=m12-14.163.com
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: (-0.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.997, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview: This issue is similar with https://issues.guix.gnu.org/45828.
 But it still not fixed in 127a88d390417d5d7b1b4a18c1b69c7169dcaf34. When
 you have multiple substituters, Guix will try to fetch narinfo from the second
 or even third substituters, and it dies. 
 Content analysis details:   (2.6 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4      RBL: Very Good reputation (+4)
 [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider (all_but_last[at]163.com)
 0.9 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
 [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;
 id=all_but_last%40163.com; ip=209.51.188.17; r=debbugs.gnu.org]
 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
 [URI: mirror.c1r3u.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 2.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL       No description available.
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/)