#40626 - Poor performance on low-end ARMv7 devices

Package	Source(s)		Maintainer(s)
guix		PTS Buildd Popcon

Message #31 received at 40626@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 40626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2020 04:49:08 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 14 00:49:08 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1jvCsO-0006mL-5c
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:49:08 -0400
Received: from cyberdimension.org ([80.67.179.20]:42120
 helo=gnutoo.cyberdimension.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>) id 1jvCsL-0006mC-Qz
 for 40626@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:49:06 -0400
Received: from gnutoo.cyberdimension.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by cyberdimension.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c0da11dd;
 Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:47:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from primarylaptop.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [::1])
 by gnutoo.cyberdimension.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 698a7363;
 Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:47:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 06:39:59 +0200
From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#40626: Poor performance on low-end ARMv7 devices
Message-ID: <20200714063959.19196a53@primarylaptop.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <87ft9vr12g.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87a73exj5v.fsf@inria.fr>
 <20200703015725.11a6515c@primarylaptop.localdomain>
 <87ft9vr12g.fsf@gnu.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/zD7benGhrppGhhjBGIlqW3s";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 40626
Cc: 40626@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:34:15 +0200
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> skribis:
> 
> > Many ARM Single Board Computers are commonly used with microSD for
> > storage, and some microSD cards are extremely slow (and sometimes
> > unreliable when they are old).
> >
> > Could the performance issues be related to storage device I/Os?
> 
> It could be the reason; it’s definitely the case on the board I was
> using here.
> 
> Still I wonder what could be done on our side to improve on this.
I guessed that was the intent.

A way to deal with that could be to validate if it's actually the case,
for instance by installing an SSD, and doing performance comparison
with the time command.

Then if it helps a lot, we probably need to trace the filesystem access
and optimize it somehow. Maybe that can be done with BPF or gprof, but
I never looked into obtimizing I/O performances, so I'm unsure if
that's the right approach. Guile may have profiling tools too.

As for benchmarking the CPU, I've patched phoronix-test-suite in a very
quick and dirty way in Parabola, so we could at least have some
benchmarks. For now we only have "compilation" benchmarks with source
code that should be FSDG compliant.

With it I've found that the compilation performances can vary a lot
between different ARM and x86 boards:
- An I.MX6 Quad with 2G of RAM is about 4.5x faster than the AM335x of a
  Beaglebone Green with 512M of RAM.
- A Lime2 A20 is about 1.7x faster than the Beaglebone Green and 2.5x
  slower than the board with the I.MX6 Quad.
- My smartphone (Galaxy SIII GT-I9300) is about 2x faster than my server
  (PC Engines APU1) for compilation.

Denis.

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Display info messages

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Sun Sep 7 12:06:48 2025; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

#40626 Poor performance on low-end ARMv7 devices