#33848 Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"

Received: (at 33848) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2021 16:12:57 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 31 12:12:56 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55304 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lRdSi-00019C-Ax
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:12:56 -0400
Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:41569)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1lRdSh-00018w-8A
 for 33848@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:12:55 -0400
X-Originating-IP: 92.169.147.163
Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1335-163.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr
 [92.169.147.163]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz)
 by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD07620003;
 Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:12:48 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>, Guillaume Le Vaillant
 <glv@posteo.net>
Subject: Re: bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"
In-Reply-To: <87tuoscsk9.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87r2e8jpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <877eg0i43j.fsf@netris.org>
 <87d0psi1xo.fsf@gnu.org> <874lb3kin6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87sgynezha.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvj2yesd.fsf@netris.org>
 <877efwe04u.fsf@gnu.org> <8736qji7c1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87tvizvzgk.fsf@netris.org> <87o9979gfn.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87tvizgghs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k1juaomo.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87muoqhk62.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhsq8wkj.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87d0pmhbgn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87r2e28tkv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <874laygkiy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lfa5eymf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87tuoscsk9.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:12:48 +0200
Message-ID: <87im57b8u7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview: A brief discussion has ensued on SBCL bugtracker: - It's
 unlikely
 that SBCL will change its internal string representation. - The main
 recommendation
 for an easy fix without updating the scanner is that we tweaked our build
 system to dump the store r [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust [217.70.183.200 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4      RBL: Very Good reputation (+4)
 [217.70.183.200 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
 [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)]
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33848
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>, 33848@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  A brief discussion has ensued on SBCL bugtracker: - It's unlikely
    that SBCL will change its internal string representation. - The main recommendation
    for an easy fix without updating the scanner is that we tweaked our build
    system to dump the store r [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             low trust
                             [217.70.183.200 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4      RBL: Very Good reputation (+4)
                             [217.70.183.200 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD