GNU bug report logs

#33848 Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"

PackageSource(s)Maintainer(s)
guix PTS Buildd Popcon
Full log

Message #73 received at 33848@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 33848) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2018 22:05:53 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 27 17:05:53 2018
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gcdmq-0006hq-OK
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 17:05:52 -0500
Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:53759)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1gcdmp-0006hh-6j
 for 33848@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 17:05:51 -0500
Received: from mimimi (moi44-1-78-199-129-170.fbx.proxad.net [78.199.129.170])
 (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz)
 by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 301A8240007;
 Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:05:47 +0000 (UTC)
References: <87r2e8jpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <877eg0i43j.fsf@netris.org>
 <87d0psi1xo.fsf@gnu.org> <874lb3kin6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87sgynezha.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvj2yesd.fsf@netris.org> <877efwe04u.fsf@gnu.org>
 <8736qji7c1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tvizvzgk.fsf@netris.org>
 <87o9979gfn.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvizgghs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87k1juaomo.fsf@gnu.org> <87muoqhk62.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87zhsq8wkj.fsf@gnu.org>
User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"
In-reply-to: <87zhsq8wkj.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:05:44 +0100
Message-ID: <87d0pmhbgn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33848
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>, 33848@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> The reference scanner, currently written in C++, traverses whole
> directory trees.  Being C++ it treats file names as byte arrays so it
> doesn’t matter what the file name encoding is.

But what matters then is that the filename encodings on the filesystem and in the
binary match, right?

> Note also that the reference scanner only looks for “xyz…-foo”; what
> comes before and after doesn’t matter.  So for example if you have
> “/gnu/store/xyz…-foo/à”, what’s important is the “xyz…-foo” bit.

OK, makes sense, then my main worry is just moot :)

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Sat Apr 12 03:01:27 2025; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.