#33848 Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"

Received: (at 33848) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2021 09:22:30 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 01 05:22:30 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60275 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lclpV-0002wH-Oh
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 05:22:30 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:54209)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1lclpT-0002u2-1x
 for 33848@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 05:22:27 -0400
X-Originating-IP: 92.169.147.163
Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1335-163.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr
 [92.169.147.163]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz)
 by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5DE01C0007;
 Sat,  1 May 2021 09:22:19 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>, Ludovic Courtès
 <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"
In-Reply-To: <878s4zo7z2.fsf@netris.org>
References: <87r2e8jpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2e28tkv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <874laygkiy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lfa5eymf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87tuoscsk9.fsf@gnu.org> <87im57b8u7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87czvebky2.fsf@netris.org> <87eefu30a4.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87im56l6es.fsf@yamatai> <87wntm8j18.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87a6qil4b1.fsf@yamatai> <87a6qiz5b3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <871rbtc3j5.fsf@netris.org> <87r1js9udv.fsf@netris.org>
 <87sg47vp16.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <875z139liy.fsf@netris.org>
 <87ft04sefs.fsf@gnu.org> <8735w472oo.fsf@netris.org>
 <87v98zomjv.fsf@gnu.org> <87wntfrfd1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <878s4zo7z2.fsf@netris.org>
Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 11:22:19 +0200
Message-ID: <87fsz6st9w.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Hi Mark, thanks for the update and thanks for getting your
 hands dirty, this is a very valuable contribution to the core of Guix! Cheers!
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
 [217.70.183.197 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust [217.70.183.197 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
 [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33848
Cc: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>, 33848@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hi Mark, thanks for the update and thanks for getting your
    hands dirty, this is a very valuable contribution to the core of Guix! Cheers!
    
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
                             [217.70.183.197 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             low trust
                             [217.70.183.197 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD