#33848 Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"

Received: (at 33848) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2021 20:04:22 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 30 16:04:22 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59883 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lcZN8-0000vi-9J
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:04:22 -0400
Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:45676)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1lcZN6-0000vQ-70
 for 33848@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:04:20 -0400
Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>)
 id 1lcZMw-0005X6-Lp; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:04:10 -0400
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>, Ludovic Courtès
 <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"
In-Reply-To: <87wntfrfd1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <87r2e8jpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0pmhbgn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87r2e28tkv.fsf@gnu.org> <874laygkiy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87lfa5eymf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tuoscsk9.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87im57b8u7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87czvebky2.fsf@netris.org>
 <87eefu30a4.fsf@gnu.org> <87im56l6es.fsf@yamatai>
 <87wntm8j18.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a6qil4b1.fsf@yamatai>
 <87a6qiz5b3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <871rbtc3j5.fsf@netris.org>
 <87r1js9udv.fsf@netris.org> <87sg47vp16.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <875z139liy.fsf@netris.org> <87ft04sefs.fsf@gnu.org>
 <8735w472oo.fsf@netris.org> <87v98zomjv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87wntfrfd1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:03:18 -0400
Message-ID: <878s4zo7z2.fsf@netris.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Hi Pierre, and Ludovic, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
 writes: > I also agree this looks like a net win even though the `guix gc`
 issue > is not fix. > The latter seems to be relatively easier to fix, doesn't
 it? Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
 [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33848
Cc: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>, 33848@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)