#33848 Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"

Received: (at 33848) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2021 06:51:59 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 03 02:51:59 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33192 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lSa8V-0003FA-2Q
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 02:51:59 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:50393)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1lSa8T-0003Ey-Iy
 for 33848@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 02:51:57 -0400
X-Originating-IP: 92.169.147.163
Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1335-163.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr
 [92.169.147.163]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz)
 by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 171B4E0007;
 Sat,  3 Apr 2021 06:51:50 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>, Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>
Subject: Re: bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"
In-Reply-To: <87r1js9udv.fsf@netris.org>
References: <87r2e8jpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvizvzgk.fsf@netris.org>
 <87o9979gfn.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvizgghs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87k1juaomo.fsf@gnu.org> <87muoqhk62.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87zhsq8wkj.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0pmhbgn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87r2e28tkv.fsf@gnu.org> <874laygkiy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87lfa5eymf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tuoscsk9.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87im57b8u7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87czvebky2.fsf@netris.org>
 <87eefu30a4.fsf@gnu.org> <87im56l6es.fsf@yamatai>
 <87wntm8j18.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a6qil4b1.fsf@yamatai>
 <87a6qiz5b3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <871rbtc3j5.fsf@netris.org>
 <87r1js9udv.fsf@netris.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 08:51:49 +0200
Message-ID: <87sg47vp16.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Wow, that was fast, thank you Mark! Any idea how I can test
 this, i.e. how I can force a graft? -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust [217.70.183.196 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
 [217.70.183.196 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
 [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33848
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>, 33848@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Wow, that was fast, thank you Mark! Any idea how I can test
    this, i.e. how I can force a graft? -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/
    
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             low trust
                             [217.70.183.196 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [217.70.183.196 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD