Message #133 received at 33848@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Received: (at 33848) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2021 17:35:45 +0000 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 01 13:35:45 2021 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58506 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lS1EP-0006mD-H0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:35:45 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:33168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1lS1EO-0006m0-0z for 33848@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:35:44 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1lS1EH-0008L3-9D; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:35:37 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>, Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> Subject: Re: bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible" In-Reply-To: <87a6qiz5b3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87r2e8jpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <877efwe04u.fsf@gnu.org> <8736qji7c1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tvizvzgk.fsf@netris.org> <87o9979gfn.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvizgghs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k1juaomo.fsf@gnu.org> <87muoqhk62.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhsq8wkj.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0pmhbgn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87r2e28tkv.fsf@gnu.org> <874laygkiy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lfa5eymf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tuoscsk9.fsf@gnu.org> <87im57b8u7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87czvebky2.fsf@netris.org> <87eefu30a4.fsf@gnu.org> <87im56l6es.fsf@yamatai> <87wntm8j18.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a6qil4b1.fsf@yamatai> <87a6qiz5b3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:33:55 -0400 Message-ID: <871rbtc3j5.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes: > I'm not familiar with the grafting code, so anyone who is (Mark? Ludo?) > might be able to fix this much quicker than me! :) I'll think about what would be required to modify our grafting code to support UCS-4. Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33848 Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>, 33848@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/> List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.