GNU bug report logs

#33848 Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"

PackageSource(s)Maintainer(s)
guix PTS Buildd Popcon
Full log

Message #121 received at 33848@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 33848) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2021 10:07:06 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 01 06:07:06 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56380 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lRuED-0002bp-Sg
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 06:07:06 -0400
Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:21993)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1lRuEB-0002bI-7i
 for 33848@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 06:07:04 -0400
X-Originating-IP: 92.169.147.163
Received: from mimimi (lfbn-idf2-1-1335-163.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr
 [92.169.147.163]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz)
 by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABF9024000D;
 Thu,  1 Apr 2021 10:06:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>
Subject: Re: bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"
In-Reply-To: <87a6qil4b1.fsf@yamatai>
References: <87r2e8jpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvj2yesd.fsf@netris.org>
 <877efwe04u.fsf@gnu.org> <8736qji7c1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87tvizvzgk.fsf@netris.org> <87o9979gfn.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87tvizgghs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k1juaomo.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87muoqhk62.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhsq8wkj.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87d0pmhbgn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87r2e28tkv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <874laygkiy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lfa5eymf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87tuoscsk9.fsf@gnu.org> <87im57b8u7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87czvebky2.fsf@netris.org> <87eefu30a4.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87im56l6es.fsf@yamatai> <87wntm8j18.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87a6qil4b1.fsf@yamatai>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 12:06:54 +0200
Message-ID: <87czvez5c1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> writes: > Oh, you say
 this file would be created for every Lisp package. I thought > it would only
 be for the standalone binary case,
 because the "regular" > asdf-build-system/sbcl
 used for Lisp libraries shi [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust [217.70.183.193 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
 [217.70.183.193 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
 [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)]
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33848
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>,
 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>, 33848@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> writes: > Oh, you say
    this file would be created for every Lisp package. I thought > it would only
    be for the standalone binary case, because the "regular" > asdf-build-system/sbcl
    used for Lisp libraries shi [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             low trust
                             [217.70.183.193 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [217.70.183.193 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> writes:

> Oh, you say this file would be created for every Lisp package. I thought
> it would only be for the standalone binary case, because the "regular"
> asdf-build-system/sbcl used for Lisp libraries ships the sources and its
> make-asdf-configuration phase creates links to the required Lisp
> dependencies in '/gnu/store/...', so there should not be missing
> references.

Right.

The only case where there could be a missing reference is if the source
code contains an FFI reference stored in non-ASCII / UTF-8.

So we need to parse other encodings too as Mark suggested if I
understand correctly.

> I just wondered: does the grafting code take '.fasl' files into
> consideration?
> If yes, I guess a Lisp library could also end up in a strange
> half-grafted state if the grafting code modifies ASCII references and
> not UTF-32 ones...

Absolutely, .fasls suffer from the same problem since they may encode
strings as UTF-32.

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Sat Apr 12 10:02:52 2025; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.