#33848 Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"

Received: (at 33848) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2021 07:13:24 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 01 03:13:24 2021
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1lRrW8-0006Km-Gu
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 03:13:24 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:49897)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1lRrW7-0006KY-3J
 for 33848@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 03:13:23 -0400
X-Originating-IP: 92.169.147.163
Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1335-163.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr
 [92.169.147.163]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz)
 by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D275E1C000E;
 Thu,  1 Apr 2021 07:13:15 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>, Ludovic Courtès
 <ludo@gnu.org>, Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>
Subject: Re: bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"
In-Reply-To: <87czvebky2.fsf@netris.org>
References: <87r2e8jpfx.fsf@gnu.org> <877eg0i43j.fsf@netris.org>
 <87d0psi1xo.fsf@gnu.org> <874lb3kin6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87sgynezha.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvj2yesd.fsf@netris.org>
 <877efwe04u.fsf@gnu.org> <8736qji7c1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87tvizvzgk.fsf@netris.org> <87o9979gfn.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87tvizgghs.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k1juaomo.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87muoqhk62.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhsq8wkj.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87d0pmhbgn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87r2e28tkv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <874laygkiy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lfa5eymf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87tuoscsk9.fsf@gnu.org> <87im57b8u7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87czvebky2.fsf@netris.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 09:13:15 +0200
Message-ID: <87sg4aa35g.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Thank you for the reminder, Mark, I had forgotten about your
 suggestion. If we are going for a SBCL-specific solution, I believe that
 all references are stored in plain text files at some points (the .asd files
 and the .lisp files) which are often encoded in ASCII / UTF-8, [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 10.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust [217.70.183.197 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
 [217.70.183.197 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
 [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)]
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33848
Cc: 33848@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Thank you for the reminder, Mark, I had forgotten about your
    suggestion. If we are going for a SBCL-specific solution, I believe that
   all references are stored in plain text files at some points (the .asd files
    and the .lisp files) which are often encoded in ASCII / UTF-8, [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
                             low trust
                             [217.70.183.197 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
                             [217.70.183.197 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)]
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD