GNU bug report logs

#28659 Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash

PackageSource(s)Maintainer(s)
guix PTS Buildd Popcon
Full log

Message #87 received at 28659@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 28659) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2020 15:44:04 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 15 10:44:04 2020
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36304 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1j2zbv-00046Z-RT
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:44:04 -0500
Received: from mail-qk1-f180.google.com ([209.85.222.180]:38919)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>)
 id 1j2zbu-00045u-Hv; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:44:02 -0500
Received: by mail-qk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id a141so2322473qkg.6;
 Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:44:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=wGat2wBYQaNE+KjKgvtcx6jPWKxjvIFjXh4dwRN8OH8=;
 b=Ft8bYApvP6Z5wLTLedIvIFqO0SfMRdiPt7tDaUHF7MDkvXQOgTPRCEmog4Gw3mxvaV
 7m0uZ+cre1sOp8wJoxFrUFQZhjFXKrcoRIooWsIHCtJT6JehXe9Rrq82wU6vZ0+kenTB
 5yu7e7Jzzc1E7JKPNk2M4h2r9cOqDfKR0t+FHL14D6kJkZphqtye6uQrlfOnLJBdPWFo
 Q/5rZWnT1EgzvGrcKM1sro8IldWXPKI+9BBmI9EW+wyTqjEbx+okMC7m4CUMc/Z7k/3c
 zcqwCFiI5VbS6pFyfTrHHsHHTUFt+JuGZelkhXrNLI0PgoAgp7REpmMOlxIdM7OzVpxF
 HqOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=wGat2wBYQaNE+KjKgvtcx6jPWKxjvIFjXh4dwRN8OH8=;
 b=rKbzz7rtpV4IR0pjdk0i/D7sC9JkYA9RkRZvdU/dcCR5y0+DGTrpf1pLk9ArAYEWn7
 SMSneM5biq5Qs3avE6n+yAx4p7fwULQOp1ici1HJc9Cx7AhqMOEXNXaSanac19c7NuBv
 Fg8xzmyVRusUVFVUjwBSPs8jVl6EQN9rC+0/V1qcM7KbWtDUb7Xx/W1GsDiRsNKXEI6P
 B+85aw6NoLUBcmXvfBEC9dqOcH2FVzq4CraaNBcLysTZeztYCG83Pi61330b3AQG3GLc
 btxZ2Rw6MSxMqAEvwYs6jWoZR1BGLpp2/ytZ6iMDpV28ZUCahBuMNwbwj6tOdwwMvMIW
 /y3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUX5ORBvuzMiL2829fJOIMlLis+DSVBJpm1IcUeHNezwuzNkjc5
 tPXVhg1jHd7dScR3vHsf4G6zyebsmsMfvyRy3ew=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwiniZRlyiXMkhx+ZN6W/pQJpZWdIpzpTmVCkE0/T04Pv8IUIwhsKHss7QdnQtx+hP/6j8AmLKh4tF2ZQ27qmg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1112:: with SMTP id
 o18mr7243365qkk.126.1581781437018; 
 Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:43:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87y2t7j54n.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeuy2mua.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87pnehe0zk.fsf@gnu.org> <878sl47t0q.fsf@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <878sl47t0q.fsf@gnu.org>
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 16:43:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ0-zPcs+pC4tQEymD-On-aN_-hgKRkRzBJzusdbtdYdAg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified
 in-place
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28659
Cc: 39575@debbugs.gnu.org, 28659@debbugs.gnu.org,
 Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Hi,

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Also, one could argue that we’d steer users towards downloading from our
> server, which could be a privacy concern (probably not a strong argument
> since one can easily change the substitute URLs.)

I am not following the privacy concern.
What do you mean?

Cheers,
simon




Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Mon Sep 8 01:24:51 2025; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.