#28659 - Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash

Package	Source(s)		Maintainer(s)
guix		PTS Buildd Popcon

Message #42 received at 28659@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 28659) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2017 20:29:16 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 02 16:29:16 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44589 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dz7L2-0005Kn-7d
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:29:16 -0400
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:55987)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1dz7Kw-0005KV-Ey
 for 28659@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:29:10 -0400
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00BB22840;
 Mon,  2 Oct 2017 16:29:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
 by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:29:09 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
 :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc
 :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=we671giaR7IBvrqX26SP/SKyAZuzWTqWxokP8W
 +BBVA=; b=OVrEGVKUnSDlGwNgXVHfpZqNCtbY3q6yimBbAITV7mUbSkzLjZv4e4
 UcxJz33lQDEWLVy+8Uh9vpCyIbN9eL6hU05XjC4adetbUyOdw/KviUVYmNwR+hl4
 oQJss/gu3RNjLGuEkvhinMMHuwCEcsoM55nCW5i4g+pnXs/7cNekw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=we671giaR7IBvrqX26
 SP/SKyAZuzWTqWxokP8W+BBVA=; b=EOIkd7iWjhPt+tUMpeEcoYw1nGET0y665m
 fYvJmwdKz7PF0qbNrCxSSFYbdZBkK1zLT3k9x1HPF988g9QkWqAgNEN5vWuBhU8U
 UTfy3ASXg4FEcEQ1FJQwG4/kcvHPJuB6Xcg6mPqEVlZCfpyFxjsF0DHDgvKVyvIy
 m24YGA4+wUwgKHRSKO5YmK/gpcPdiCzuEM/1TsxUE/PHylh2V2jBVJoJ+7BfMhZF
 pmHlEINVVeMwa5Ui3xK4Qgde/mQt96l/ckNgYjqfO7r6rDPHW5P3+nLVWuvncvqT
 iBwz2IoTpGEAzJ+gDp6Czz9mhynXQeBlQu1q24gsbSF5qmmxa4gA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:laHSWTf1TqzQRRED5QfVsjCAnLu05nuVI7HmHVQiD1wlweMYIsDsCw>
X-Sasl-enc: gCr/REJKc0PM5rmYgJq1OMzdD9QPZQlMZyFE8arRG+wq 1506976149
Received: from localhost (c-73-165-108-70.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.165.108.70])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 572027F9CC;
 Mon,  2 Oct 2017 16:29:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:29:07 -0400
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1
 content hashes fail
Message-ID: <20171002202907.GA23960@jasmine.lan>
References: <877ewf18d4.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9ppoabw.fsf@gnu.org>
 <20171002182208.GB10773@jasmine.lan> <878tgt721q.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87a8198fli.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87a8198fli.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28659
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>, 28659@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hmm.  I'm not sure what problem we are solving.  Should we only do this
> for github(-like) tarballs?  Do we see this problem with other sources,
> should we prevent it?  Possibly github will never do something like this
> again.  Or we could banish github/gitlab(?) auto-generated tarballs and
> go for git checkouts+commits?

Files referenced by URL (location-addressing vs content-addressing) have
been changed in place by a variety of hosters and upstream projects
since I've started paying attention to these issues. I don't think we
need to do anything special regarding GitHub.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Display info messages

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Mon Sep 8 06:58:29 2025; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

#28659 Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash