GNU bug report logs

#28659 Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash

PackageSource(s)Maintainer(s)
guix PTS Buildd Popcon
Full log

Message #33 received at 28659@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 28659) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2017 18:22:12 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 02 14:22:12 2017
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44525 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dz5M3-00028T-US
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 14:22:12 -0400
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:54951)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1dz5M1-00028L-9d
 for 28659@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 14:22:09 -0400
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B37522853;
 Mon,  2 Oct 2017 14:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161])
 by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Oct 2017 14:22:09 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name;
 h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
 :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc
 :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=2l77qxbpjzWfJLk4n5flFQmnTkJqITWFJpa/H3
 mJhDk=; b=B03VV/vBuaK8g/22BWkYwHWFq25GcuYvzRrvAbRGJJPczEC/ILJKEc
 84NpJZDpSJEkTFjqjtipGL8FEXafLmIxnF8MYz7SwoZSjiVnr3VhWVVq8oV3wZcS
 q7MCiyo8ZVNBcIw7Ci2FhCMWgkDJBxmFUAth4dk/1fYXoLSAatZxk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=2l77qxbpjzWfJLk4n5
 flFQmnTkJqITWFJpa/H3mJhDk=; b=U5SvRy9rsKVrCjAi3DoIRIaDwat8aUIE6g
 OojuVkQT/bcsZkRMk3bUQ3JJ3MD/lF29ygVAykh4XgGYUKEagtwGJCWWyn3W7Ygy
 KHJ/yuISMEv68FViH199DegxnvSSiRKegIDVcyCsIdUNetUNXJ7DoXFNF1KazlrU
 7PxbuJ9Ax3QizOzjrwP11NoivJu4aVtUNMFFC2mNx1818dXmtYjk5BzihvwYIaWg
 HefYRr9iuc9uwwAQFAD6/9CrBYrbiVZix30dzOscpSKyTS2GEDsnSrLV2+jGU911
 rSv1m/8pz8WxOKTUhh0HLEOJXpeES1XN4yUO9L8HnbxrV/M2oJDw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:0YPSWVkdsYdkfxscJjTxGeLYk7c1yyH1NcQDypLiX4h240IHmmHNeA>
X-Sasl-enc: /eiJI/oC2ss+Vu3BOlU4HqgZ/Yk59XA7Ofa/sPufX8HI 1506968528
Received: from localhost (c-73-165-108-70.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.165.108.70])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DECBF24724;
 Mon,  2 Oct 2017 14:22:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:22:08 -0400
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1
 content hashes fail
Message-ID: <20171002182208.GB10773@jasmine.lan>
References: <877ewf18d4.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87o9ppoabw.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87o9ppoabw.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28659
Cc: 28659@debbugs.gnu.org, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 05:09:39PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> What’s sad here is that we do have the right tarball at:
> 
>   https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz/sha256/1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s

It seems to me that there are several reasons someone may choose not to
use substitutes. Some of those reasons (reproducibility and security
concerns) are obviated for fixed-output derivations like upstream
sources, and I think it would be fine to still use substitutes for these
derivations.

But the motivations of privacy, self-sufficiency, etc are not addressed
by that idea.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Mon Sep 8 11:16:38 2025; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.