#28510 crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla

Received: (at 28510) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2022 19:42:48 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 20 15:42:48 2022
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1oaj8q-0000Kf-4g
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 15:42:48 -0400
Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:60428)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <dev@jpoiret.xyz>) id 1oaj8l-0000KU-UM
 for 28510@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 15:42:46 -0400
Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64])
 by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D944D184BCF;
 Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:42:41 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim;
 t=1663702962;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=YL2VqyAY0VoBOXWfpxADWiCkOMd0cPEQ0qpT/TKoaIc=;
 b=FBLQrEY/OaWcVXLUYg/jeIDiuxLDnjW1YBryYwcwgf4Y2GMm2QdoZWGPF7RmSrSzb3SCJ1
 lDQZCV8qbQ/oOhb/b0oKJV5tLMauKComjxtCOfwzveseOkMUCmbRAhyEFwXDFSIF6VlCyf
 1w4g71PDDwWV611RqAcydHIOikDMGQCuEQjpZsYP3DGKN1pw9Qe/gL29YLRxzkDlEQooyW
 DY8vMGBPloEwdtxVmkZyXNWhamJo+h+c2QYwFlXHfB1rewaYyOMD9fy5dDLxFlw8EGZ9JK
 sEdLZSBgOklO09vU+0OoSKD0Jn5ziU5RASDTA6m9B465hrrYRbierj3XdYtMMQ==
From: Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>, Maxime Devos
 <maximedevos@telenet.be>, Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski
 <jeremy@korwin-zmijowski.fr>, 28510@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#28510: crash: guix build -S foo --with-source=bla
In-Reply-To: <86a66u0xhr.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <idjwp4uvqim.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
 <d566d759-38d7-849e-d067-35e207359210@korwin-zmijowski.fr>
 <229c1399-ce4b-b942-1bae-deea501f1c48@telenet.be>
 <87k05y2yjc.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <86a66u0xhr.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 21:42:41 +0200
Message-ID: <87h7113k9a.fsf@jpoiret.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz;
 auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@jpoiret.xyz smtp.mailfrom=dev@jpoiret.xyz
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spamd-Bar: +
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hi Simon, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes: > Well,
    I would add an error handler; as proposed [1]. :-) Because does > “guix
    build foo --source --with-source=bla” make sense? What is the > use-case
    for such command? 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
  0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28510
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hi Simon, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes: > Well,
    I would add an error handler; as proposed [1]. :-) Because does > “guix
    build foo --source --with-source=bla” make sense? What is the > use-case
    for such command? 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)]
 -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
  0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager