GNU bug report logs

#27155 [PATCH 0/2] Support service extensions on the "final" service values

PackageSource(s)Maintainer(s)
guix-patches PTS Buildd Popcon
Full log

Message #61 received at 27155@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 27155) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2025 19:36:34 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 01 15:36:34 2025
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58569 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1utAKP-00035H-Vn
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2025 15:36:34 -0400
Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::]:47478 helo=mail.ditigal.xyz)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rutherther@ditigal.xyz>)
 id 1utAKO-000353-FR
 for 27155@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2025 15:36:32 -0400
Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f15da36a
 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); 
 Mon, 1 Sep 2025 19:36:26 +0000 (UTC)
From: Rutherther <rutherther@ditigal.xyz>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bug#27155] [PATCH 0/2] Support service extensions on the "final"
In-Reply-To: <87o6ru9o75.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20170530215850.7522-1-ludo@gnu.org>
 <87bju16vue.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <87o6ru9o75.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2025 21:36:24 +0200
Message-ID: <87zfbej77r.fsf@ditigal.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz;
 i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1756755386; h=from : to : cc
 : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id :
 mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from;
 bh=P7vgSMKtJ7FesGfjhZDGg6ZkjpJR5H0/bMIyQfnmboQ=;
 b=JeE6CgeuVSDy1UW8cuTuSXTGyQmtNPDdbJEikv+exeAZfNzFQrvABxecbYRhi2zFCb7ha
 bdIi2T+OodgMif3s6uQbdgi3IgLegA09KUcxLTHfQe316d7p+9XTXM/jbyq+LKD97R1G0uQ
 I0GnJxjUtroRI6LaZr2MN2pntFM+opU=
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hi Simon, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
    > Hi, > > On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 at 12:47, Rutherther <rutherther@ditigal.xyz>
    wrote: > >> what's the state of this? Why has this been abandoned? > > Well,
    #27155 [1] does not seem abandoned but…:-) > [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 27155
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>,
 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>, 27155@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hi Simon, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
    > Hi, > > On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 at 12:47, Rutherther <rutherther@ditigal.xyz>
    wrote: > >> what's the state of this? Why has this been abandoned? > > Well,
    #27155 [1] does not seem abandoned but…:-) > [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.5 points, 10.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD      Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: ditigal.xyz (xyz)]
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
  1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD      Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager

Hi Simon,

Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 at 12:47, Rutherther <rutherther@ditigal.xyz> wrote:
>
>> what's the state of this? Why has this been abandoned?
>
> Well, #27155 [1] does not seem abandoned but…:-)
>
>
> 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/27155
>
>> I am really missing a feature like this, so it pains me to see
>> an abandoned thread that clearly states (and I agree) that this
>> feature has been long overdue, but now it's been even 8 more years longer!
>
> What would be the best strategy to move forward on this?
>
> Maybe it could help to start a fresh PR on Codeberg and then open a
> thread on guix-devel.  Rutherther, WDYT?

I think Ludo's suggestion to make usage examples is a good one. I am not
sure about a PR, because I think there are many ways to approach this
problem of transforming already service values so that it would
make sense to me to first agree on an approach and only then open a PR.
I think a PR having a specific implementation to do this could easily get
unnoticed or rejected, while the underlying problem still remains.

Rutherther

>
> Cheers,
> simon

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Mon Sep 8 11:35:44 2025; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.