GNU bug report logs

#22883 Trustable "guix pull"

PackageSource(s)Maintainer(s)
guix PTS Buildd Popcon
Full log

Message #19 received at 22883@debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at 22883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2016 00:14:01 +0000
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 25 20:14:01 2016
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1auqdc-0004mj-V6
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:14:01 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:47456)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1auqdb-0004mZ-0c
 for 22883@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:13:59 -0400
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974FF205E1
 for <22883@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:13:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161])
 by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:13:58 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
 :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=HbRXh1aHgyQ52+siPd2kksD9Ax0=; b=AY67fm
 MIlKaCmd6bv46hkjReqcZs1Ckl8x7ZiL3jRy87rWqimiVCoFqv/N3+PzrYLoz/FY
 Q3WG3kuaXuJb940lRZe3f2K6sdteJoq3jYjv78ADpkTnWOgbCoBwcsOGpCp1bRlU
 zqJyY41DUjt4U/vr6gRNz2ocmemOGcmR9beC8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=HbRXh1aHgyQ52+s
 iPd2kksD9Ax0=; b=e76l+EF5u74UucwpBaMN83J2/MM7hNNpfLKtPi6iJYu62/9
 s9oR6FjcGTpdIVOCcazF7ehA8cwC48Ci0VGmrKHJ6noNIDtGKxZ2k9tRfsz4VlaY
 WrniG2guuM/smuhjdDP+kmNktELjfBi8eqLma7AimeYiXhs/SJrCk9nUYneE=
X-Sasl-enc: sSnSNso29RADYpGueVXWMR2uR5XnNx3ExFTTg1Ses/pD 1461629638
Received: from localhost (c-69-249-5-231.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [69.249.5.231])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 57A156801D6;
 Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:13:58 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:13:59 -0400
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#22883: Trustable "guix pull"
Message-ID: <20160426001359.GA23088@jasmine>
References: <87io14sqoa.fsf@dustycloud.org>
 <87h9ep8gxk.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <87h9ep8gxk.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 22883
Cc: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>, 22883@debbugs.gnu.org
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/>
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit>, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:25:11AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> skribis:
> 
> > On top of that, even if you run from git proper what there isn't a test
> > about is: can you trust those latest commits?  Git doesn't really check,
> > at least by default.
> >
> >   https://mikegerwitz.com/papers/git-horror-story
> >
> > How about this: anyone with commit access should use "signed off by" and
> > gpg signatures combined.  We should keep some list of guix committers'
> > gpg keys.  No commit should be pushed to guix without a gpg signature.
> > At this point, at least, there is some possibility of auditing things.
> 
> To make progress on this front, I’ve decided to start signing all my
> commits, so:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ git config commit.gpgsign
> true
> $ git config --global user.signingkey
> 090B11993D9AEBB5
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> I invite everyone to do the same.  Hopefully, within a few weeks, we can
> add a commit hook to reject unsigned commits.

Okay.

> Note that we’ll be signing patches we push on behalf of contributors who
> do not have commit access (reviewer’s responsibility).
> 
> Also, rebasing, amending, and cherry-picking code signed by someone else
> would lose the original signature, which isn’t great and should be
> avoided, if possible.

I think it's common to make minor edits when committing on behalf of
others. For example, the committer might clean up a commit message or
standardize indentation.

How should we handle this?




Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


debbugs.gnu.org maintainers <help-debbugs@gnu.org>. Last modified: Sun Dec 22 01:05:24 2024; Machine Name: wallace-server

GNU bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.