[PATCH] gnu: ngtcp2: Update to 1.15.1.

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Andreas Enge
  • Tomas Volf
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Tomas Volf
Severity
normal

Debbugs page

T
T
Tomas Volf wrote on 10 Sep 16:26 -0700
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)(name . Tomas Volf)(address . ~@wolfsden.cz)
daa218064b33fadd938196d3f01842f7a37f45b0.1757546793.git.~@wolfsden.cz
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (ngtcp2): Update to 1.15.1.

Change-Id: I793d98dfa2d5a140d342a279eda390d73fbe7c34
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (24 lines)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index ee938b4cb0..36bfc8bd40 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/networking.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
@@ -4749,7 +4749,7 @@ (define-public nbd
(define-public ngtcp2
(package
(name "ngtcp2")
- (version "1.13.0")
+ (version "1.15.1")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch)
@@ -4757,7 +4757,7 @@ (define-public ngtcp2
"releases/download/v" version "/"
"ngtcp2-" version ".tar.gz"))
(sha256
- (base32 "1sik0rlpar1dk46ahssv59ik1w360v97hydzari77m8khfjscxd1"))))
+ (base32 "1r3128v6fwn1p7py57frp4ij251z4rv4mfxknhjwylw9i3gr947r"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(arguments
(list
--
2.50.1
A
A
Andreas Enge wrote on 20 Sep 07:49 -0700
(name . Tomas Volf)(address . ~@wolfsden.cz)(address . 79431@debbugs.gnu.org)
aM6--ucQK2ZuXDZ0@jurong
This has too many dependents to be applied directly, unfortunately.

Andreas
T
T
Tomas Volf wrote 6 days ago
(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)(address . 79431@debbugs.gnu.org)
87zfaniq9w.fsf@wolfsden.cz
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

Toggle quote (2 lines)
> This has too many dependents to be applied directly, unfortunately.

True ^_^

In the past I was able to send the email with --subject-prefix='PATCH
core-updates' in cases like this, but that branch is now gone with
seemingly no direct replacement. When I am aware about the excessive
number of dependents, what branch should I mark as target for the patch
in question? The documentation does not seem to provide a guidance on
this (or I cannot find it).

Tomas

--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
A
A
Andreas Enge wrote 5 days ago
(name . Tomas Volf)(address . ~@wolfsden.cz)(address . 79431@debbugs.gnu.org)
aNEEn0ygUoa-CG2x@jurong
Am Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 09:01:15PM +0200 schrieb Tomas Volf:
Toggle quote (4 lines)
> In the past I was able to send the email with --subject-prefix='PATCH
> core-updates' in cases like this, but that branch is now gone with
> seemingly no direct replacement.

The branch has gone quite some time ago; so in the end adding "core-updates"
to the subject line was more of a social signal to committers not to push
the commit to master.

Toggle quote (5 lines)
> When I am aware about the excessive
> number of dependents, what branch should I mark as target for the patch
> in question? The documentation does not seem to provide a guidance on
> this (or I cannot find it).

Unfortunately this is a hole in our procedures; it depends on someone
picking it up in the context of larger changes.

Andreas
T
T
Tomas Volf wrote 5 days ago
(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)(address . 79431@debbugs.gnu.org)
87frcei4jv.fsf@wolfsden.cz
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

Toggle quote (8 lines)
>> When I am aware about the excessive
>> number of dependents, what branch should I mark as target for the patch
>> in question? The documentation does not seem to provide a guidance on
>> this (or I cannot find it).
>
> Unfortunately this is a hole in our procedures; it depends on someone
> picking it up in the context of larger changes.

I see, thank you for the information. For the time being I will stop
sending patches for packages with lot of dependents, to save you some
time. ^_^ It will save me time as well, -P1 takes a while on ngtcp2.

Tomas

--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
A
A
Andreas Enge wrote 3 days ago
(name . Tomas Volf)(address . ~@wolfsden.cz)(address . 79431-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
aNPFM0Fspm219m2b@jurong
Am Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 11:02:44PM +0200 schrieb Tomas Volf:
Toggle quote (4 lines)
> I see, thank you for the information. For the time being I will stop
> sending patches for packages with lot of dependents, to save you some
> time. ^_^ It will save me time as well, -P1 takes a while on ngtcp2.

Well, if you add that you have built all the -P1 already, that would be
a useful information, and maybe enough to merge a package with moderately
many dependents.

For this package, it turns out there is also a pull request on codeberg:
so I will close it here.

Andreas
Closed
?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 79431@patchwise.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 79431
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch