Request for merging "rust-team" branch

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
5 participants
  • Andreas Enge
  • Andreas Enge
  • Efraim Flashner
  • Gabriel Santos
  • Hilton Chain
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Hilton Chain
Severity
normal

Debbugs page

H
H
Hilton Chain wrote on 13 Jul 02:12 -0700
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)
y76tt3g5uam.fsf@ultrarare.space
Apologize for the long delay, since all build work is already there, I should
start the merge process earlier.

rust-team has been rebased with Rust 1.88
(https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/989),except the one patch changing the
default Rust version.

I need help to finish transfering https://codeberg.org/hako/guix-rust-registry,
there's a button to accept it.

The remaining work is:
2. Add a news entry.
3. Test guix-rust-past-crates.

I expect to finish most of them within today. Since there's also a build job on
ci.guix.gnu.org, the merge process should not take too long.
A
A
Andreas Enge wrote on 13 Jul 08:05 -0700
(name . Hilton Chain)(address . hako@ultrarare.space)(address . 79004@debbugs.gnu.org)
aHPLNJmRjzj2LT77@jurong
Hello,

Am Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 05:12:01PM +0800 schrieb Hilton Chain:
Toggle quote (3 lines)
> I need help to finish transfering https://codeberg.org/hako/guix-rust-registry,
> there's a button to accept it.

I have clicked on the button.

Toggle quote (2 lines)
Suggestion for links as above: Even if it is typographically ugly, leave
a space between the URL and the punctuation mark; this makes it possible
to directly click on it.

Andreas
H
H
Hilton Chain wrote on 13 Jul 08:29 -0700
(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)
y76sej03y9g.fsf@ultrarare.space
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

Toggle quote (14 lines)
> Hello,
>
> Am Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 05:12:01PM +0800 schrieb Hilton Chain:
>> I need help to finish transfering https://codeberg.org/hako/guix-rust-registry,
>> there's a button to accept it.
>
> I have clicked on the button.
>
>> 1. Address reviews in https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/387.
>
> Suggestion for links as above: Even if it is typographically ugly, leave
> a space between the URL and the punctuation mark; this makes it possible
> to directly click on it.

Thanks! I'll note that.

I'm going to rebase rust-team to address a CI issue:
G
G
Gabriel Santos wrote on 13 Jul 08:31 -0700
Re: [bug#79004] Request for merging "rust-team" branch
(address . 79004@debbugs.gnu.org)
3DE00183-0886-4B98-8725-AF18E073FBBE@disroot.org
Em 13 de julho de 2025 12:05:24 BRT, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> escreveu:
Toggle quote (14 lines)
>Hello,
>
>Am Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 05:12:01PM +0800 schrieb Hilton Chain:
>> I need help to finish transfering https://codeberg.org/hako/guix-rust-registry,
>> there's a button to accept it.
>
>I have clicked on the button.
>
>> 1. Address reviews in https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/387.
>
>Suggestion for links as above: Even if it is typographically ugly, leave
>a space between the URL and the punctuation mark; this makes it possible
>to directly click on it.

I like using <>:


Thunderbird for Android seems to also add it automatically.

--
Gabriel Santos
H
H
Hilton Chain wrote on 14 Jul 07:58 -0700
Re: Request for merging "rust-team" branch
(address . 79004@debbugs.gnu.org)
y76wm8a95uk.fsf@ultrarare.space
Added draft news entry to the pull request.
Rebased rust-team to a revision processed by the data service.
A
A
Andreas Enge wrote on 25 Jul 07:32 -0700
Re: [bug#79004] Request for merging "rust-team" branch
(name . Gabriel Santos)(address . gabrielsantosdesouza@disroot.org)
aIOVd5lDb24l9MvL@jurong
Hello all,

the rust-team branch is moving slowly, but surely to the front; you may
wish to already rebase it, since the core-packages-team push has
shuffled quite a few things.

And I wanted to ask if the team is happy with the changes and the branch
close to final shape, also with respect to

All the best,

Andreas
H
H
Hilton Chain wrote on 25 Jul 09:35 -0700
(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)
y764iv0fcsz.fsf@ultrarare.space
Hi Andreas,

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

Toggle quote (10 lines)
> Hello all,
>
> the rust-team branch is moving slowly, but surely to the front; you may
> wish to already rebase it, since the core-packages-team push has
> shuffled quite a few things.
>
> And I wanted to ask if the team is happy with the changes and the branch
> close to final shape, also with respect to
> https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/387

I haven't checked the build status after the core-packages-team merge, I'll take
a look locally. I'll also address the remaining reviews on next push.

Thanks
H
H
Hilton Chain wrote on 26 Jul 00:17 -0700
(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)
y76y0sbe7z6.fsf@ultrarare.space
Hilton Chain <hako@ultrarare.space> writes:

Toggle quote (17 lines)
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> the rust-team branch is moving slowly, but surely to the front; you may
>> wish to already rebase it, since the core-packages-team push has
>> shuffled quite a few things.
>>
>> And I wanted to ask if the team is happy with the changes and the branch
>> close to final shape, also with respect to
>> https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/387
>
> I haven't checked the build status after the core-packages-team merge, I'll take
> a look locally. I'll also address the remaining reviews on next push.

Build failures of dev86@0.16.21 and python-pytorch@2.7.0 blocked a handful of
packages.
E
E
Efraim Flashner wrote on 30 Jul 04:44 -0700
x86_64 build report
aIoFkgTjaxDsHpGn@3900XT
I used guix time-machine to do a build run on Berlin and everything
built except for xen-guest-agent (dev86), niri and (python-pytorch).
With the update to dev86 from master applied on the rust-team branch
xen-guest-agent built without problems, and niri built locally. I'm
sending it through again on berlin to see if I can figure out why it
didn't work there.

I haven't gotten a chance to try any builds yet on aarch64 or riscv64

--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=emur
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


A
A
Andreas Enge wrote on 10 Aug 10:48 -0700
Re: [bug#79004] Request for merging "rust-team" branch
(name . Hilton Chain)(address . hako@ultrarare.space)
aJjbZqLSz2RCTQiw@jurong
Hello,

we expect to merge go-team tomorrow. nss-updates currently has a problem
that may or may not be fixed till then. Is rust-team ready to jump to
the front of the queue if necessary?

Please rebase in any case on the latest master commit known to the data
service, see the green badges at


Thanks,

Andreas
H
H
Hilton Chain wrote on 11 Aug 04:31 -0700
Re: x86_64 build report
(name . Efraim Flashner)(address . efraim@flashner.co.il)
y76o6smgkma.fsf@ultrarare.space
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

Toggle quote (10 lines)
> I used guix time-machine to do a build run on Berlin and everything
> built except for xen-guest-agent (dev86), niri and (python-pytorch).
> With the update to dev86 from master applied on the rust-team branch
> xen-guest-agent built without problems, and niri built locally. I'm
> sending it through again on berlin to see if I can figure out why it
> didn't work there.
>
> I haven't gotten a chance to try any builds yet on aarch64 or riscv64


For niri, I think setting RAYON_NUM_THREADS[1] would help.

H
H
Hilton Chain wrote on 11 Aug 10:36 -0700
Re: [bug#79004] Request for merging "rust-team" branch
(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)
y76v7mtpxp6.fsf@ultrarare.space
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

Toggle quote (6 lines)
> Hello,
>
> we expect to merge go-team tomorrow. nss-updates currently has a problem
> that may or may not be fixed till then. Is rust-team ready to jump to
> the front of the queue if necessary?

I see you have addressed the issue :)

Since there won't be major build changes on the branch, both options are
acceptable to me.

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> Please rebase in any case on the latest master commit known to the data
> service, see the green badges at
> https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/repository/1/branch/master

Thanks, rebased.
A
A
Andreas Enge wrote on 11 Aug 11:11 -0700
(name . Hilton Chain)(address . hako@ultrarare.space)
aJoyVuxTJve6sBpj@jurong
Am Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 01:36:37AM +0800 schrieb Hilton Chain:
Toggle quote (2 lines)
> I see you have addressed the issue :)

Yes, nss-updates should be ready to go.

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> Since there won't be major build changes on the branch, both options are
> acceptable to me.
> Thanks, rebased.

Thanks! So in the end, there will be no urgency, and it will be your
turn in hopefully a few days, or maybe only a week.

Thanks for your reactivity,

Andreas
A
A
Andreas Enge wrote on 15 Aug 07:50 -0700
(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas.enge@laposte.net)
aJ9JIxRAAFsNX75Y@jurong
Hello,

things advance well with nss-updates, and with a bit of luck, we may
even be able to push to master tomorrow. Could you already rebase
rust-team on nss-updates? Then data.qa would already evaluate the new
commit, and building could start immediately. I tried it myself, but
between changed files in cargo-something on nss-updates and the file
having been deleted on rust-team I did not know what to do.

In case something goes wrong, I have backed up the current branch as
rust-team-on-master.

Thanks,

Andreas
H
H
Hilton Chain wrote on 16 Aug 01:28 -0700
(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)
y76ikinzn3p.fsf@ultrarare.space
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

Toggle quote (6 lines)
> Hello,
>
> things advance well with nss-updates, and with a bit of luck, we may
> even be able to push to master tomorrow. Could you already rebase
> rust-team on nss-updates? Then data.qa would already evaluate the new

Rebased!

Toggle quote (6 lines)
> commit, and building could start immediately. I tried it myself, but
> between changed files in cargo-something on nss-updates and the file
> having been deleted on rust-team I did not know what to do.
>
> In case something goes wrong, I have backed up the current branch as
> rust-team-on-master.
A
A
Andreas Enge wrote on 18 Aug 02:09 -0700
(name . Hilton Chain)(address . hako@ultrarare.space)
aKLtsHHuraoX0K6Y@jurong
Hello,

things have worked out, the rust-team branch has started after nss-updates.
A bit slowly, with only 200 x86_64 packages built overnight, but I hope
the pace will go up. I have rebased it on the master commit
50f65b553d2f5ebccb5f8a0ae41fb99077e362f6 . Now we (hopefully) just need
to wait.

Andreas
A
A
Andreas Enge wrote on 20 Aug 14:39 -0700
(name . Hilton Chain)(address . hako@ultrarare.space)
aKZAdurK3XX0yI7N@jurong
The branch is essentially built, 228 packages missing on x86_64, 1 on i686,
86 on aarch64; nothing peculiar in the numbers.

But I tend to overlook that this may hide important leaf packages that
do not build... In my own home profile, this concerned librewolf, but
this one has been repaired by the first master commit after which we had
rebased. So for good measure, I have rebased once more on commit
824989b0d47b5cd12dfc6f3d6ffc836319ccf287 .

I have forced a new evaluation by the data service:

Please feel free to push if you deem the branch ready.

Andreas
H
H
Hilton Chain wrote on 21 Aug 03:33 -0700
(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)
y76plcpotfs.fsf@ultrarare.space
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

Toggle quote (9 lines)
> The branch is essentially built, 228 packages missing on x86_64, 1 on i686,
> 86 on aarch64; nothing peculiar in the numbers.
>
> But I tend to overlook that this may hide important leaf packages that
> do not build... In my own home profile, this concerned librewolf, but
> this one has been repaired by the first master commit after which we had
> rebased. So for good measure, I have rebased once more on commit
> 824989b0d47b5cd12dfc6f3d6ffc836319ccf287 .

Seeing through the logs, the failures seem to be on the QA side. I have
no issue building these broken packages on x86_64-linux.

I haven't built all of them on aarch64-linux, but at least emacs succeeds.

Toggle quote (5 lines)
> I have forced a new evaluation by the data service:
> https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/revision/1d0877d7cde8580df340bb5a01a47880e4dd1a52
>
> Please feel free to push if you deem the branch ready.

Thanks, I'm going to merge the branch.
H
H
Hilton Chain wrote on 21 Aug 04:33 -0700
(address . 79004-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
y76jz2wq57l.fsf@ultrarare.space
Hilton Chain <hako@ultrarare.space> writes:

Toggle quote (23 lines)
> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:
>
>> The branch is essentially built, 228 packages missing on x86_64, 1 on i686,
>> 86 on aarch64; nothing peculiar in the numbers.
>>
>> But I tend to overlook that this may hide important leaf packages that
>> do not build... In my own home profile, this concerned librewolf, but
>> this one has been repaired by the first master commit after which we had
>> rebased. So for good measure, I have rebased once more on commit
>> 824989b0d47b5cd12dfc6f3d6ffc836319ccf287 .
>
> Seeing through the logs, the failures seem to be on the QA side. I have
> no issue building these broken packages on x86_64-linux.
>
> I haven't built all of them on aarch64-linux, but at least emacs succeeds.
>
>> I have forced a new evaluation by the data service:
>> https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/revision/1d0877d7cde8580df340bb5a01a47880e4dd1a52
>>
>> Please feel free to push if you deem the branch ready.
>
> Thanks, I'm going to merge the branch.

Merged :)
Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 79004@patchwise.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 79004
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch