On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 2:22 AM Ada Stevenson <adanskana@gmail.com> wrote:
Toggle quote (47 lines)
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't believe this triggers a rebuild, since the source hash is the
> same. Running on my local system, Guix still reached for the
> substitutes, despite the changed package definition.
>
> On 17/03/2025 3:13 pm, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:03:20AM -0400, Greg Hogan wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 4:17 AM Ada Stevenson <adanskana@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> * gnu/packages/boost.scm (boost-for-source-highlight)
> >>> [source] <uri>: Update dead link to active link.
> >>>
> >>> Change-Id: Ib10a2ef6b57bc787a34d62eaaa0885a5dcd0a1a8
> >>> ---
> >>> gnu/packages/boost.scm | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/boost.scm b/gnu/packages/boost.scm
> >>> index e464400ad9..cb45b2efd9 100644
> >>> --- a/gnu/packages/boost.scm
> >>> +++ b/gnu/packages/boost.scm
> >>> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ (define-public boost-for-source-highlight
> >>> (version "1.83.0")
> >>> (source (origin
> >>> (method url-fetch)
> >>> - (uri (string-append "https://boostorg.jfrog.io/artifactory/main/release/"
> >>> + (uri (string-append "https://archives.boost.io/release/"
> >>> version "/source/boost_"
> >>> (version-with-underscores version) ".tar.bz2"))
> >>> (patches
> >>> --
> >>> 2.48.1
> >>
> >> cc'ing the rust team because source-highlight has ~12,000 dependent
> >> packages, nearly all due to gdb/pinned which is a dependency of rust.
> >
> > Does this cause a rebuild of anything? If it doesn't then it should be
> > fine for master. If it does cause rebuilds then we can grab it for the
> > rust-team branch (or another one even).
> >
>
> --
> Warmly,
> Ada
You are both right, and my understanding of what perturbates a Guix
derivation has also now been updated.
The last commit is pushed as d88d271de774b785c49c0e554231f65336067275.
Thank you for the patchset, Ada.
Greg