kmime-24.05.2 test failure

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Marek Paśnikowski
  • Zheng Junjie
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Marek Paśnikowski
Severity
normal

Debbugs page

M
M
Marek Paśnikowski wrote on 6 Sep 05:04 -0700
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
87ttetm1iy.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl
I am not able to reconfigure my system due to the following regression
in kmime-24.05.2:

starting phase `check'
Running tests...
/gnu/store/ibgy9qa52zqmbcfp6m8rwj81bffaiwvb-cmake-minimal-3.24.2/bin/ctest --force-new-ctest-process
Test project /tmp/guix-build-kmime-24.05.2.drv-0/build
Start 1: kmime-rfc2047test
1/17 Test #1: kmime-rfc2047test ................ Passed 0.01 sec
Start 2: kmime-utiltest
2/17 Test #2: kmime-utiltest ................... Passed 0.22 sec
Start 3: kmime-contentindextest
3/17 Test #3: kmime-contentindextest ........... Passed 0.01 sec
Start 4: kmime-charfreqtest
4/17 Test #4: kmime-charfreqtest ............... Passed 0.01 sec
Start 5: kmime-headertest
5/17 Test #5: kmime-headertest ................. Passed 0.01 sec
Start 6: kmime-contenttest
6/17 Test #6: kmime-contenttest ................ Passed 0.01 sec
Start 7: kmime-messagetest
7/17 Test #7: kmime-messagetest ................ Passed 0.01 sec
Start 8: kmime-headerfactorytest
8/17 Test #8: kmime-headerfactorytest .......... Passed 0.01 sec
Start 9: kmime-rfc2231test
9/17 Test #9: kmime-rfc2231test ................ Passed 0.01 sec
Start 10: kmime-sizetest
10/17 Test #10: kmime-sizetest ................... Passed 0.01 sec
Start 11: kmime-parsedatetimetest
11/17 Test #11: kmime-parsedatetimetest .......... Passed 0.01 sec
Start 12: kmime-dateformattertest
12/17 Test #12: kmime-dateformattertest ..........***Failed 0.02 sec
********* Start testing of DateFormatterTest *********
Config: Using QtTest library 6.6.3, Qt 6.6.3 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 11.4.0), unknown unknown
PASS : DateFormatterTest::initTestCase()
FAIL! : DateFormatterTest::testFancyFormat() Compared values are not the same
Actual (f.dateString(dt)) : "Today 12:34:56"
Expected (u"Today 12:34 PM"): Today 12:34 PM
Loc: [/tmp/guix-build-kmime-24.05.2.drv-0/kmime-24.05.2/autotests/dateformattertest.cpp(27)]
PASS : DateFormatterTest::testLocalizedFormat()
PASS : DateFormatterTest::testFormat(ctime)
PASS : DateFormatterTest::testCustomFormat()
PASS : DateFormatterTest::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 5 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 8ms
********* Finished testing of DateFormatterTest *********

Start 13: kmime-attachmenttest
13/17 Test #13: kmime-attachmenttest ............. Passed 0.01 sec
Start 14: kmime-typestest
14/17 Test #14: kmime-typestest .................. Passed 0.01 sec
Start 15: test_mdn
15/17 Test #15: test_mdn ......................... Passed 0.01 sec
Start 16: test_charfreq
16/17 Test #16: test_charfreq .................... Passed 0.00 sec
Start 17: test_dates
17/17 Test #17: test_dates ....................... Passed 0.01 sec

94% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 17

Total Test time (real) = 0.40 sec

The following tests FAILED:
12 - kmime-dateformattertest (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
make: *** [Makefile:74: test] Error 8

Test suite failed, dumping logs.
error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception:
%exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: ("test" "-j" "8") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f>
phase `check' failed after 0.4 seconds
M
M
Marek Paśnikowski wrote on 6 Sep 07:55 -0700
(address . 73067@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . zhengjunjie@iscas.ac.cn)
87h6as6dck.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl
Dear Zheng

Thank you for your hard work bringing KDE to Guix. It is not the best
circumstance to express my gratitude, but I want you to know I am
grateful before anything else.

With commit 2f407ac162d6b9053bafb611ff20b58b13e7a09c to guix, you have
modified the testing phase of kmime build, which I currently suspect as
the reason for the inability to reconfigure my systems. I also suspect
the recent merge of core-updates could have caused this breakage.

For your convenience, here is the link to the bug report:
It contains the build output narrowed to the check phase.

Do you think this could be at least worked around relatively quickly? I
will do my best to assist with the review process.
Z
Z
Zheng Junjie wrote on 6 Sep 09:36 -0700
(name . Marek Paśnikowski via Bug reports for GNU Guix)(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
87zfokzqll.fsf@iscas.ac.cn
Marek Paśnikowski via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org> writes:

Toggle quote (11 lines)
> Dear Zheng
>
> Thank you for your hard work bringing KDE to Guix. It is not the best
> circumstance to express my gratitude, but I want you to know I am
> grateful before anything else.
>
> With commit 2f407ac162d6b9053bafb611ff20b58b13e7a09c to guix, you have
> modified the testing phase of kmime build, which I currently suspect as
> the reason for the inability to reconfigure my systems. I also suspect
> the recent merge of core-updates could have caused this breakage.

This is caused by core-updates, I don't know why, just disable it should
be OK, see 643e7ecbe6079e8cc2275cc6cdf1cda04f6f818a.

Toggle quote (7 lines)
>
> For your convenience, here is the link to the bug report:
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/73067
> It contains the build output narrowed to the check phase.
>
> Do you think this could be at least worked around relatively quickly? I
> will do my best to assist with the review process.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfr6klGDOXiwIdX/bO1qpk+Gi3/AFAmbbL5YACgkQO1qpk+Gi
3/Dfbg/9E2uEUdx0RWCLS6m6fyDhTxMQeVPRhtHevP2RZy+zCz7ZPHPYgqhRxBm0
yIJIia5A82LZPKAGu6ejhDGS4R0AFubzdo3msP6dPH0oqZvHjEJ/uVjnDrr4lOFf
pTa4ktAra6GiaNHyoKIIDY7ci+bfd+wNodCPO1Xn+I8QwGdmydZXs4ltFCRTYALV
heohHqRvBtmpJ4sw1RrERhaIUVEPRyQ9JjE98KVqrN1hOzoq1zSS/rRyiGFn/b4t
Qq1rgvcxEXBjrR5S4kRkX8zwlbtfFVii6po4gfSXH3CJaiuKD1WJwsU2R72rweDQ
5xifF3t53authL7i7hepO/F/do73SEHGmRbRju6peMY+X7qYwXMflAYqCl+RhwmF
xIsO1uAwR+LC+mrSQJ9vgjSQH/frinplpWx8rkbNXUFVOVemjHHiWE2T4Z/t29eB
5OC5pfUTgulYRLiEwpoIwx/0/njI1hZlO4ZOA0Xf+KSJlK0BQIQoru5T62VVrnS2
RDfCB47sgBxttkdz47MKlm/WfFqqkIZOhtExbJpJLw+TygJczBVVJtKQnfJYPkNX
i7IUa3V4adZ9YysPCYEIPr54HuVIbisaflYG/40ue4Vng6eyEBkRGIGLTgbU4LR1
sxzJ4V+r+ctjRRc3sEEk+QPky7zZ9QSdK+L84N1KpiYiL4WD+gM=
=VQNu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

M
M
Marek Paśnikowski wrote on 7 Sep 10:26 -0700
(name . Zheng Junjie)(address . zhengjunjie@iscas.ac.cn)
87le03wf2r.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl
Thank you very much for quick response. I confirm I was able to
finish reconfiguration of my systems. I wish you all the best.
?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 73067@patchwise.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 73067
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch