Guile 3.0.7 test suite fails non-deterministically

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
5 participants
  • Michael Jury
  • Carl Dong
  • Leo Famulari
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • Maxime Devos
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Michael Jury
Severity
important
Merged with

Debbugs page

M
M
Michael Jury wrote on 12 May 2021 16:51
Guix pull failed
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
CABrMUgfcbdWoXa5cGyJPq7Gya-PMZOf0BXC+TuOROEECM8xBcg@mail.gmail.com
guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
'/gnu/store/0bgadpjvbbr1cs2pr9z4kqizx3k7smil-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
"6a724b0277f31245a0573c8347a6462786d7c0d1"; system: "x86_64-linux";
host version: "55aa50834fe07597adddbfc4e007de9420b195ec"; pull-version: 1).
Please report it by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.

Let me know if you want the backtrace or anything else

--
Best
-Michael Jury
"The question isn't who will let me, the question is who will stop me."
Attachment: file
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 12 May 2021 19:30
(no subject)
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
YJyPU/82FDnmPFW8@jasmine.lan
merge 48392 48391 48390 48389
M
M
Michael Jury wrote on 13 May 2021 13:16
Never mind.
(address . 48389@debbugs.gnu.org)
CABrMUgfBAjR=G7SEA1YAwt96t9zwmp1GVtpPjH0wM=szfRonsg@mail.gmail.com
After a re-boot it went away.

I had tried pulling for a while assuming a network issue.
But didn't try a reboot.
Attachment: file
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 13 May 2021 13:53
control message for bug #48389
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87tun6s6dn.fsf@gnu.org
merge 48389 48395
quit
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 13 May 2021 13:58
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
875yzms64i.fsf@gnu.org
retitle 48389 Guile 3.0.7 test suite fails non-deterministically
quit
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 13 May 2021 13:58
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
874kf6s64f.fsf@gnu.org
severity 48389 important
quit
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 13 May 2021 14:02
Re: bug#48389: Guix pull failed
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)
87pmxuqrd9.fsf_-_@gnu.org
Hi,

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

Toggle quote (12 lines)
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:34:15PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> Guile 3.0.7 failed to build on the build farm, during the test suite.
>>
>> There's nothing to link to on ci.guix.gnu.org because Cuirass can't
>> evaluate Guix without Guile.
>>
>> I've attached the build log.
>
> I logged in to berlin.gnu.org and tried building the Guile derivation
> again. It failed once, then succeeded, then failed a few more times. So
> there is some nondeterminism in the test suite.

Ouch, apologies for that (I did test on all 4 platforms before pushing
and didn’t stumble upon this issue.)

The log you posted is mangled. Do you have a clearer one at hand?

Toggle quote (2 lines)
> At least now there is a substitute for it.

Yeah.

Thanks,
Ludo’.
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 13 May 2021 18:26
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
YJ3RvkLzMIqfmjHw@jasmine.lan
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 11:02:42PM +0200, Ludovic Court�s wrote:
Toggle quote (2 lines)
> The log you posted is mangled. Do you have a clearer one at hand?

I downloaded it from here, and it works:


But now I've attached it uncompressed; it's only 281 KiB.
Attachment: k1n1d8zxni80jpxxgzjqrg5yzaj7sl-guile-3.0.7.drv
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 14 May 2021 02:44
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)
87wns1ps3x.fsf@gnu.org
Hi Leo,

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> Running suspendable-ports.test
> UNRESOLVED: suspendable-ports.test: non-revealed port is closed
> ERROR: suspendable-ports.test: revealed port fdes not closed - arguments: ((system-error "seek" "~A" ("Bad file descriptor") (9)))

I can’t seem to reproduce it in the Guile build tree, neither with:

while ./check-guile suspendable-ports.test ; do : ; done

nor with:

while ./check-guile ; do : ; done

We’ll have to try to gather more info if it comes up again, or see if
there are configs that trigger it more easily.

Thanks,
Ludo’.
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 7 Jun 2021 12:06
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
YL5uS5FbpjPw7q1L@jasmine.lan
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:44:18AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Toggle quote (3 lines)
> We’ll have to try to gather more info if it comes up again, or see if
> there are configs that trigger it more easily.

It's happening again for the ungrafting evaluation:

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/45377/log/raw(sorry, this log is unhelpful)

And Chris Baines sees it in the Guix Data Service too:


For now I'm doing something like `guix gc --clear-failures
/gnu/store/...-guile-3.0.7 && guix build /gnu/store/...-guile-3.0.7.drv`
in a loop on the Berlin server.
C
C
Carl Dong wrote on 15 Jul 2021 14:17
Guile 3.0.7 test suite fails non-deterministically
(address . 48389@debbugs.gnu.org)
4AF272E1-1F51-4576-8CAF-EB8246CDDD36@carldong.me
Hi all,

I’m also encountering this exact error when time-machining from 0961807915d7955e70a081272d857b6cbf92c0c8 to 83d9e2ee56cb0ca2a644074ad232503e25ac7116

I’m able to reproduce this (I’ve tried building the derivation 5 times now with different --cores, and this error happens every time)


My system:
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24-Core Processor
- Guix on Arch Linux
- tmpfs mounted on /tmp

Cheers,
Carl Dong
contact@carldong.me
"I fight for the users"
M
M
Maxime Devos wrote on 19 Jul 2021 04:05
‘non-revealed port is closed’ test case is already fixed
0ca8049ef1812d2d4079d57c5c9fb9ea874abc4d.camel@telenet.be
Hi guilers and guix,

I (and some other people) encountered this bug:


There is already a fix:


Apparently it is already applied on Debian:


Maybe it can be applied now on 'main'?

Also, could it be added to the 'patches' in Guix?

Greetings,
Maxime.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYPVccRccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7rVeAQDMgKFXqRr2qm32DypkLzXnDhdA
64HqcDXM5wx6fidxkwD+IiuO58YfdwKqfSQe6uM9f5WxH0g6Q45MbWxX8Q/hzAs=
=gjmC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 48389@patchwise.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 48389
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch