[PATCH] ui: 'relevance' connects regexps with a logical and.

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • zimoun
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
zimoun
Severity
normal

Debbugs page

Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 18 Sep 2019 08:57
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)
20190918155757.4198-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com
Previously, the logical and connecting the regexps did not output the expected
results (introduced in 8874faaaac665100a095ef25e39c9a389f5a397f).

* guix/ui.scm (relevance)
[score]: Change its arguments.
[regexp->score]: New procedure.
* tests/ui.scm ("package-relevance"): Add test.
---
guix/ui.scm | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
tests/ui.scm | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (93 lines)
diff --git a/guix/ui.scm b/guix/ui.scm
index 7920335928..4be31db047 100644
--- a/guix/ui.scm
+++ b/guix/ui.scm
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2018 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
;;; Copyright © 2019 Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
;;; Copyright © 2019 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
+;;; Copyright © 2019 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -1281,33 +1282,32 @@ weight of this field in the final score.
A score of zero means that OBJ does not match any of REGEXPS. The higher the
score, the more relevant OBJ is to REGEXPS."
- (define (score str)
- (define scores
- (map (lambda (regexp)
- (fold-matches regexp str 0
- (lambda (m score)
- (+ score
- (if (string=? (match:substring m) str)
- 5 ;exact match
- 1)))))
- regexps))
-
+ (define (score regexp str)
+ (fold-matches regexp str 0
+ (lambda (m score)
+ (+ score
+ (if (string=? (match:substring m) str)
+ 5 ;exact match
+ 1)))))
+
+ (define (regexp->score regexp)
+ (let ((score-regexp (lambda (str) (score regexp str))))
+ (fold (lambda (metric relevance)
+ (match metric
+ ((field . weight)
+ (match (field obj)
+ (#f relevance)
+ ((? string? str)
+ (+ relevance (* (score-regexp str) weight)))
+ ((lst ...)
+ (+ relevance (* weight (apply + (map score-regexp lst)))))))))
+ 0 metrics)))
+
+ (let ((scores (map regexp->score regexps)))
;; Return zero if one of REGEXPS doesn't match.
(if (any zero? scores)
0
- (reduce + 0 scores)))
-
- (fold (lambda (metric relevance)
- (match metric
- ((field . weight)
- (match (field obj)
- (#f relevance)
- ((? string? str)
- (+ relevance (* (score str) weight)))
- ((lst ...)
- (+ relevance (* weight (apply + (map score lst)))))))))
- 0
- metrics))
+ (reduce + 0 scores))))
(define %package-metrics
;; Metrics used to compute the "relevance score" of a package against a set
diff --git a/tests/ui.scm b/tests/ui.scm
index 2138e23369..d8573e88d8 100644
--- a/tests/ui.scm
+++ b/tests/ui.scm
@@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ Second line" 24))
(gcrypt (specification->package "guile-gcrypt"))
(go (specification->package "go"))
(gnugo (specification->package "gnugo"))
+ (libb2 (specification->package "libb2"))
(rx (cut make-regexp <> regexp/icase))
(>0 (cut > <> 0))
(=0 zero?))
@@ -283,6 +284,8 @@ Second line" 24))
(=0 (package-relevance go
(map rx '("go" "game"))))
(>0 (package-relevance gnugo
- (map rx '("go" "game")))))))
+ (map rx '("go" "game"))))
+ (>0 (package-relevance libb2
+ (map rx '("crypto" "library")))))))
(test-end "ui")
--
2.21.0
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 19 Sep 2019 12:54
(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)(address . 37448@debbugs.gnu.org)
87k1a4ysd9.fsf@gnu.org
Hey ho,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:

Toggle quote (9 lines)
> Previously, the logical and connecting the regexps did not output the expected
> results (introduced in 8874faaaac665100a095ef25e39c9a389f5a397f).
>
> * guix/ui.scm (relevance)
> [score]: Change its arguments.
> [regexp->score]: New procedure.
> * tests/ui.scm ("package-relevance"): Add test.

Perfect, applied.

Thanks!

Ludo’.
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 19 Sep 2019 12:54
control message for bug #37448
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87impoysd4.fsf@gnu.org
tags 37448 fixed
close 37448
quit
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 37448@patchwise.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 37448
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch