Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • zimoun
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
zimoun
Severity
important
Merged with

Debbugs page

Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 9 Sep 2020 07:31
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
87eenbuim8.fsf_-_@gmail.com
Hi,

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

Toggle quote (3 lines)
> One thing I don’t quite like about the patch is the fact that ‘guix
> substitutes’ connects to the daemon in ‘content-addressed-item?’.

What is the status of this patch [1] following the recent discussion about
tar “disarchive” and SWH?

Related:
All the best,
simon

L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 10 Sep 2020 01:14
(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)
87363qjbez.fsf@gnu.org
Hello,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:

Toggle quote (13 lines)
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> One thing I don’t quite like about the patch is the fact that ‘guix
>> substitutes’ connects to the daemon in ‘content-addressed-item?’.
>
> What is the status of this patch [1] following the recent discussion about
> tar “disarchive” and SWH?
>
> Related:
> - http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39575
> - http://issues.guix.gnu.org/42162
> - https://git.ngyro.com/disarchive/

Thanks for the reminder. I don’t think Timothy’s work changes anything
wrt. to this issue: it would still need to be addressed.

Ludo’.
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 2 Feb 2022 18:58
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
86zgn8zmel.fsf_-_@gmail.com
Hi Ludo,

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 at 10:30, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:

Toggle quote (6 lines)
>> So I think we have to communicate more info from the daemon to ‘guix
>> substitute’.
>
> The attached patch addresses that by simply calling out to the daemon to
> determine whether we’re dealing with a content-addressed item.

WDYT to rebase this patch [1] and resubmit to guix-patches in order to
get more attention and so potential feedback and/or review?



Cheers,
simon
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 1 May 03:35 -0700
control message for bug #28659
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87le4t7rb8.fsf@gnu.org
merge 28659 70588
quit
?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 28659@patchwise.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 28659
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch